HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stone, L. R. Articles by Schlegel, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stone, L. R. Articles by Schlegel, A. J. Agricola Articles by Stone, L. R. Articles by Schlegel, A. J. Related Collections Water Management Dryland Cropping Systems Production Agriculture Water Conservation

Production Papers

Yield–Water Supply Relationships of Grain Sorghum and Winter Wheat

^a Dep. of Agron., Throckmorton Hall, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501
^b KSU Southwest Res.-Ext. Cent., Route 1, Box 148, Tribune, KS 67879-9774

^* Corresponding author (stoner{at}ksu.edu)

Received for publication February 9, 2006. Agricultural sustainability in the USA's west-central Great Plains depends on efficient use of water—the primary yield-limiting factor in the region. With perennially water-short status, the efficient capture and storage of precipitation in soil, and the yield responsiveness of crops to water, are emphasized. Our objective was to quantify grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield responses to stored soil water and precipitation by using data gleaned from research conducted from 1973 to 2004 near Tribune, KS on Ulysses silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Aridic Haplustolls) and Richfield silt loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Aridic Argiustolls) soils. Soil water content was measured gravimetrically to the 183-cm depth at crop emergence. Grain yield was related to available soil water at emergence (ASW_e) (increased 221 kg ha^–1 cm^–1 in sorghum and 98 kg ha^–1 cm^–1 in wheat). Grain yield was also related to in-season precipitation (ISP) (increased 164 kg ha^–1 cm^–1 in sorghum and 83 kg ha^–1 cm^–1 in wheat). From response-surface analyses, 63% (sorghum) and 70% (wheat) of variations in grain yield were explained by variations in ASW_e and ISP. In data sorted by tillage, yield response to water supply (WS) was greater with no-till than with conventional tillage in both crops (184 vs. 129 kg ha^–1 cm^–1 in sorghum; 138 vs. 86 kg ha^–1 cm^–1 in wheat). This finding supports the concept that less tillage and more residue lead to more efficient use during the growing season of ASW_e and ISP.

Abbreviations: ASW_e, available soil water at emergence • ASW_p, available soil water at planting • CT, conventional, stubble-mulch (sweep) tillage • ISP, in-season precipitation • NT, no-till • RT, reduced tillage • SF, sorghum–fallow • SS, continuous sorghum • WF, wheat–fallow • WS, water supply • WSF, wheat–sorghum–fallow • WUE, water use efficiency • WW, continuous wheat

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. J. Lyon, D. C. Nielsen, D. G. Felter, and P. A. Burgener Choice of Summer Fallow Replacement Crops Impacts Subsequent Winter Wheat Agron. J., March 12, 2007; 99(2): 578 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]