HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schomberg, H. H. Articles by Cabrera, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schomberg, H. H. Articles by Cabrera, M. L. Agricola Articles by Schomberg, H. H. Articles by Cabrera, M. L. Related Collections Cotton Cover Crops Tillage

Production Papers

Conservation Tillage and Cover Crop Influences on Cotton Production on a Southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain Soil

^a USDA-ARS, J. Phil Campbell, Sr., Natural Resource Conservation Center, Watkinsville, GA
^b Univ. of Georgia, Coop. Ext. Service, Waynesboro, GA
^c Monsanto Co., Waynesboro, GA
^d Univ. of Georgia, Crop and Soil Sciences Dep., Athens, GA

^* Corresponding author (hhs1{at}uga.edu)

Received for publication December 13, 2005. Understanding cover crop and tillage system interactions within specific environments can help maximize productivity and economic returns of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) produced on sandy coastal plain soils of the southeastern USA. A strip-plot design with three replications was used to evaluate the cover crops Austrian winter pea [Pisum sativum L. ssp. arvense (L.)], balansa clover (Trifolium michelianum Savi), crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth subsp. villosa), oil seed radish (Raphanus sativus L.), black oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.), and rye (Secale cereale L.) and tillage (strip and none) influences on cotton grown on a Bonifay fine sand (loamy, siliceous, subactive, thermic Grossarenic Plinthic Paleudults) near Waynesboro, GA from 1999 to 2003. Drought influenced production 3 of 4 yr. Cover crop biomass was greatest from rye, intermediate from black oat, oilseed radish, hairy vetch, and Austrian winter pea. Hairy vetch and Austrian winter pea contained more than 80 kg N ha^–1 while other cover crops averaged <40 kg N ha^–1. Cotton yields following black oat and rye had returns above variable costs ha^–1 $461 and $406, respectively. Strip-tillage increased yields by 192 kg ha^–1 and annual returns by $112 ha^–1 over no-tillage, most likely due to improved available water. Combining strip-tillage with black oat was the best combination for maximizing profit. Using black oat with strip-tillage could increase cotton profit by $50 to $75 ha^–1 compared to systems using rye on the 1.45 million ha of cotton where conservation systems have been adopted.

Abbreviations: GDD, growing degree days • NIRS, near infrared reflectance spectroscopy