HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sullivan, D. G. Articles by Strickland, T. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sullivan, D. G. Articles by Strickland, T. C. Agricola Articles by Sullivan, D. G. Articles by Strickland, T. C. Related Collections Best Management Practices Tillage Water Conservation

Crop Residues

Evaluating Techniques for Determining Tillage Regime in the Southeastern Coastal Plain and Piedmont

^a USDA-ARS Southeast Watershed Research Lab., P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA, 31794
^b USDA-ARS South J. Phil Campbell Sr. Natural Resource Conservation Center, 1420 Experiment Station Rd., Watkinsville, GA 30677

^* Corresponding author (dgs{at}tifton.usda.gov)

Received for publication October 21, 2005. Reduced tillage and residue management can have significant impacts on soil and water quality, primarily through the accumulation of soil organic C. Yet, methods of tillage and residue cover assessment are time and resource intensive, and often do not yield spatially representative results. A major goal of this study was to compare new remote sensing (RS) indices with the current line-transect approach for differentiating between conventional (CT) and conservation tillage systems. Experimental plots were located in two physiographic regions in Georgia: the Southern Piedmont and Southern Coastal Plain. Treatments consisted of no tillage (NT) or CT at the Piedmont site, and strip-tillage (ST) or CT at the Coastal Plain site. Remotely sensed data were acquired three times prior to canopy closure, using a handheld multispectral radiometer (485–1650 nm) and thermal imager (7000–14 000 nm). Soil texture and soil water content were measured to assess the impact of changes in soil background reflectance on crop residue assessments. Results showed that differences in spectral response between CT and conservation tillage systems were best observed using a normalized difference ratio of near infrared (NIR) (1650 ± 100 nm) and blue (485 ± 45 nm) spectra under dry conditions and low canopy cover (<25%). Differences in soil texture and color were the primary limiting factors in differentiating between tillage treatments. However, using readily available soil survey data, our data indicate that visible and NIR spectra can be used to rapidly differentiate between CT and conservation tillage systems in the Georgia Southeastern Coastal Plain and Piedmont physiographic regions.

Abbreviations: ATLAS, airborne terrestrial applications sensor • CAI, cellulose absorption index • CRC, crop residue cover • CT, conventional tillage • NIR, near infrared • NT, no tillage • RS, remote sensing • ST, strip tillage • TIR, thermal infrared • TM, Thematic Mapper • VIS, visible

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. K. Gelder, A. L. Kaleita, and R. M. Cruse Estimating Mean Field Residue Cover on Midwestern Soils Using Satellite Imagery Agron. J., May 8, 2009; 101(3): 635 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.G. Sullivan, T.C. Strickland, and M.H. Masters Satellite mapping of conservation tillage adoption in the Little River experimental watershed, Georgia Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, May 1, 2008; 63(3): 112 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. L. Potter, C. C. Truman, T. C. Strickland, D. D. Bosch, and T. M. Webster Herbicide Incorporation by Irrigation and Tillage Impact on Runoff Loss J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 839 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.G. Sullivan, J.N. Shaw, A. Price, and E. van Santen Spectral Reflectance Properties of Winter Cover Crops in the Southeastern Coastal Plain Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1587 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]