Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 August 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1221-1226 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0007
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Alison, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Alison, M. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Alison, M. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Grazing Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

Production Papers

Stand Persistence and Animal Performance for Tall Fescue Endophyte Combinations in the South Central USA

A. A. Hopkinsa,* and M. W. Alisonb

a Forage Improvement Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401
b LSU Agricultural Center, Winnsboro, LA 71295

* Corresponding author (aahopkins{at}noble.org)

Received for publication January 6, 2006. Infection by an endophyte [Neotyphodium coenophialum (Morgan-Jones & Gams.) Glenn, Bacon, & Hanlin comb. nov.] can improve persistence of tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) S.J. Darbyshire = Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Novel endophytes may minimize toxicity problems associated with wild-type endophytes, thus encouraging tall fescue use in the south central USA. The objectives of these studies were to compare stand persistence and grazing animal performance among tall fescue cultivars with different fungal endophyte combinations in the south central USA. Trials were planted in 1999 in Oklahoma and Louisiana. Tall fescue entries contained no endophyte (‘GA-5’ E–, ‘Dovey’), a novel endophyte (‘Jesup’ MaxQ, ‘GA-5’ MaxQ), or a wild-type endophyte (‘KY-31’ E+, ‘GA-5’ E+). Weight gain data for beef cattle (Bos taurus) were collected during fall and/or spring. Estimates of stand persistence were collected periodically. In Oklahoma, average daily gain (ADG), at 0.71 kg d–1, did not differ between entries in fall. During spring, ADGs (kg d–1) were greater from Dovey (0.64), GA-5 MaxQ (0.67), and GA-5 E– (0.56) than from KY-31E+ (0.29) and were intermediate for GA-5E+ (0.47). In Louisiana, ADGs were greater from GA-5 E– (1.20), GA-5 MaxQ (1.06), and Jesup MaxQ (1.12) than from GA-5E+ (0.76). In Oklahoma, stands were greater than 80% 4 yr after establishment. In Louisiana, stands declined in some E– paddocks 3 yr after planting. Thus, E– and novel endophyte–infected tall fescue resulted in greatest animal performance, whereas wild-type and novel endophyte infection led to enhanced stand longevity. However, improved persistence is needed for broader adaptation of tall fescue to the south central USA.

Abbreviations: ADG, average daily gain • E+, endophyte infected • E–, endophyte free • GA-5, Georgia 5 • GPH, gain per hectare • KY-31, Kentucky 31 • RCBD, randomized complete block design




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. A. Beck, S. A. Gunter, K. S. Lusby, C. P. West, K. B. Watkins, and D. S. Hubbell III
Animal performance and economic comparison of novel and toxic endophyte tall fescues to cool-season annuals
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 2043 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.