|
|
||||||||
a Forage Improvement Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401
b LSU Agricultural Center, Winnsboro, LA 71295
* Corresponding author (aahopkins{at}noble.org)
Received for publication January 6, 2006. Infection by an endophyte [Neotyphodium coenophialum (Morgan-Jones & Gams.) Glenn, Bacon, & Hanlin comb. nov.] can improve persistence of tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) S.J. Darbyshire = Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Novel endophytes may minimize toxicity problems associated with wild-type endophytes, thus encouraging tall fescue use in the south central USA. The objectives of these studies were to compare stand persistence and grazing animal performance among tall fescue cultivars with different fungal endophyte combinations in the south central USA. Trials were planted in 1999 in Oklahoma and Louisiana. Tall fescue entries contained no endophyte (GA-5 E, Dovey), a novel endophyte (Jesup MaxQ, GA-5 MaxQ), or a wild-type endophyte (KY-31 E+, GA-5 E+). Weight gain data for beef cattle (Bos taurus) were collected during fall and/or spring. Estimates of stand persistence were collected periodically. In Oklahoma, average daily gain (ADG), at 0.71 kg d1, did not differ between entries in fall. During spring, ADGs (kg d1) were greater from Dovey (0.64), GA-5 MaxQ (0.67), and GA-5 E (0.56) than from KY-31E+ (0.29) and were intermediate for GA-5E+ (0.47). In Louisiana, ADGs were greater from GA-5 E (1.20), GA-5 MaxQ (1.06), and Jesup MaxQ (1.12) than from GA-5E+ (0.76). In Oklahoma, stands were greater than 80% 4 yr after establishment. In Louisiana, stands declined in some E paddocks 3 yr after planting. Thus, E and novel endophyteinfected tall fescue resulted in greatest animal performance, whereas wild-type and novel endophyte infection led to enhanced stand longevity. However, improved persistence is needed for broader adaptation of tall fescue to the south central USA.
Abbreviations: ADG, average daily gain E+, endophyte infected E, endophyte free GA-5, Georgia 5 GPH, gain per hectare KY-31, Kentucky 31 RCBD, randomized complete block design
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Beck, C. B. Stewart, S. A. Gunter, and D. Singh Evaluation of Tall Fescues for Stocker Cattle in the Gulf Coastal Plain Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2009; 25(5): 569 - 579. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Beck, S. A. Gunter, K. S. Lusby, C. P. West, K. B. Watkins, and D. S. Hubbell III Animal performance and economic comparison of novel and toxic endophyte tall fescues to cool-season annuals J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 2043 - 2055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||