HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thomas, J. C. Articles by Diehl, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Thomas, J. C. Articles by Diehl, K. Agricola Articles by Thomas, J. C. Articles by Diehl, K. Related Collections Turfgrass Management Turfgrass Water Pollution Irrigation

Turfgrass

Environmental Impact of Irrigating Turf with Type I Recycled Water

^a Soil and Crop Sciences Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2474
^b CH2M HILL Inc., San Antonio and Austin, TX
^c Resource Protection and Compliance Dep., San Antonio Water System, San Antonio, TX

^* Corresponding author (jc-thomas{at}tamu.edu)

Received for publication June 23, 2005. As our water reserves diminish, recycled water is increasingly being used for irrigation of turfgrasses. This study was conducted to determine the fate of nutrients contained in Type I recycled water used to irrigate turf and its effect on turf quality. Eighteen plots were randomly assigned to three replications of three irrigation treatments and two grasses. Irrigation treatments included Edwards Aquifer water applied at the evapotranspiration (ET) rate (EA), recycled water applied at the evapotranspiration rate (1XRW), and recycled water applied at 1.1 times the evapotranspiration rate to provide a leaching fraction (LFRW). Grasses included ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. x C. transvaalensis Burtt Davy) and ‘Jamur’ zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.). Rain, runoff, leachate, and soil samples were collected and analyzed for total salts, Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, N, K, Na, and Zn. The use of San Antonio Water System (SAWS) Type I recycled water had no adverse effect on turf quality but did result in a significant increase in soil electrical conductivity (EC) from 0.2518 dS m^–1 in the EA treatment to 0.3132 and 0.3171 dS m^–1 in the 1XRW and LFRW treatments, respectively. The Ca content increased from 134 108 and 135 467 mg L^–1 in the EA and 1XRW treatments to 142 835 mg L^–1 in the LFRW treatment. Na concentrations in the soil were not affected by the use of recycled water. The use of recycled water resulted in increased total salts (EC), Na and nitrate (NO₃) concentrations in leachate passing below 76 cm. The EC increased from 0.425 dS m^–1 for the EA treatment to 0.626 and 0.614 dS m^–1 for the 1XRW and LFRW treatments, respectively. Na concentrations in leachate increased from 18.33 mg L^–1 for the EA treatment to 49.10 and 52.91 mg L^–1 for the 1XRW and LFRW treatments, respectively. Runoff water from treatments irrigated with recycled water exhibited a trend of increased EC, Ca, Mn, and Na.

Abbreviations: EA, replacement of ET with Edwards Aquifer water • EAA, Edwards Aquifer Authority • EARZ, Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone • ET, evapotranspiration • 1XRW, replacement of ET with recycled water • LFRW, replacement of ET with recycled water plus 10% for leaching • SAWS, San Antonio Water System • TKN, total Kjeldahl nitrogen