Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 98:830-838 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0252
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarara, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tarara, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tarara, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Field-Scale Studies
Right arrow Numerical Solutions
Right arrow Field evaluation techniques
Right arrow Data acquisition and assimilation
Right arrow Software

Instrumentation

Two Algorithms for Variable Power Control of Heat-Balance Sap Flow Gauges under High Flow Rates

Julie M. Tarara* and John C. Ferguson

USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, 24106 N. Bunn Rd., Prosser, WA 99350

* Corresponding author (jtarara{at}wsu.edu)

Received for publication September 1, 2005. The advantages of variable power control for heat-balance sap flow gauges are evident under high flow rates (e.g., >600 g h–1) where high rates of power must be applied. Under the very high flow rates (e.g., 1500–4000 g h–1) of mature grapevines (Vitis spp.), we evaluated two algorithms to control the power applied to heat-balance sap flow gauges, and thus the temperature difference ({Delta}T) above and below gauge heaters: (i) a proportional-derivative (PD) algorithm and (ii) an open-loop controller following the theoretical diurnal course of irradiance. The PD algorithm was tuned for expected maximum flow rates and could keep {Delta}T within 0.1°C of its daytime (0800–1800 h) target value. Over 21 d, mean daytime {Delta}T was 1.32 ± 0.001°C (s.e.m.) for an 18-gauge system. The algorithm was unstable early in the morning and in the evening as rates of sap flow were below those for which the algorithm had been tuned. In the open-loop algorithm, power output was programmed to change according to a sine curve tied to daylength. In well-watered vines, the power curve mimicked actual sap flow patterns. As flow rates varied it accommodated the changing dead time of the system, which is the delay or time required before any change in {Delta}T occurs. Daytime {Delta}T varied sinusoidally with a typical amplitude of 0.5 to 1.0°C. The coefficient of variation in daytime {Delta}T appeared to be higher (16–26%) under the open-loop algorithm than under the PD algorithm (5–13%). Under weekly cycles of deficit irrigation, the variance in daytime {Delta}T increased with the number of days after irrigation, suggesting that the open-loop algorithm might best be applied when the stem energy balance includes an estimate of heat storage.

Abbreviations: D, damping factor • DOY, day of year • G, empirically derived proportional gain factor • Kg, zero-flow gauge conductance • PD, proportional-derivative algorithm







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.