|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Agric. Econ. and Agribusiness, 217 Agric. Bldg., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
b Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., 368 Ag. Hall, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
c Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environ. Sci., 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
* Corresponding author (mpopp{at}uark.edu)
Received for publication July 2, 2005.
Maize (Zea mays L.) production in the Midsouthern USA has increased dramatically in recent years, primarily as a function of growing nematode pressure in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] fields as well as the increasing yield potential of maize hybrids. Traditionally, 112- to 120-d maturity hybrids (full season) have been grown using 76-cm row spacing at population densities of
6 to 8 plants m2. These hybrids, however, reach the reproductive phase of development during the period of a typical midseason drought. Shorter-season (<110-d maturity) hybrids, by contrast, avoid a large portion of this drought and require substantially less irrigation. The yield potentials of short-season hybrids are similar to those of full-season hybrids, but they require substantially narrower rows (50 cm) and increased populations (10 to 12 plants m2). In this report, economic trade-offs among irrigation, seeding rates, yield potential, and seasonal market price trends for production of short-season hybrids are evaluated. Shorter-season hybrids were comparable to longer-season hybrids in terms of yield potential and partial returns. In general, profit-maximizing seeding rates were higher for shorter-season hybrids, and higher seasonal prices were insufficient to offset higher seeding costs and thereby change optimal hybrid choice. While irrigation use was curtailed with shorter-season hybrids, irrigation savings, at current irrigation costs, were insufficient to offset higher seeding costs. Finally, using a simple decision rule of picking maize hybrid by selecting top-yielding hybrids is challenged in this study as lower-yielding hybrids with lower seeding requirements exhibited higher comparative returns than the highest-yielding hybrids at one of the locations.
Abbreviations: PPD, plant population density in plants m2 PPD*, plant population density required to maximize partial returns PR, partial returns in $ ha1 PR*, partial returns at profit-maximizing plant population density
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. A. Bruns A Survey of Factors Involved in Crop Maturity Agron. J., January 8, 2009; 101(1): 60 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||