HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abrahamson, D. A. Articles by Hoogenboom, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Abrahamson, D. A. Articles by Hoogenboom, G. Agricola Articles by Abrahamson, D. A. Articles by Hoogenboom, G. Related Collections Evapotranspiration Soil Hydrology Cotton Solute Transport Models Cover Crops

Modeling

Evaluation of the RZWQM for Simulating Tile Drainage and Leached Nitrate in the Georgia Piedmont

^a USDA-ARS-JPCNRCC, Watkinsville, GA 30677
^b Dep. of Crop and Soil Science, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7274
^c USDA-ARS-GRL, El Reno, OK 73036
^d Biological and Agricultural Engineering Dep., Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223-1797

^* Corresponding author (dstark{at}uga.edu)

Received for publication March 11, 2005. Models have become an important tool for evaluating the impact of agricultural management practices on water quality. We evaluated the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM version 1.3.2004.213), for simulating tile drainage and NO₃ leaching under conventional and no-tillage management practices in cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.) production and rye (Secale cereale L.) cover cropping practices in a Cecil (kaolinitic, thermic, Typic Kanhapludult) soil in Georgia, USA. We calibrated the model for tile drainage and NO₃ leaching in maize (Zea mays L.) production and for cotton development and water use in a previous study based on experimental data collected from 1992 through 1993 at Watkinsville, GA. For the current study, we used an independent data set collected from 1997 through 2000. Differences in measured and simulated tile drainage were 926 mm in conventional tillage and 712 mm in no-tillage treatments. Measured and simulated values of leached NO₃ were different by 62 and 73 kg ha^–1, respectively, for the two tillage treatments. Some of the differences in simulated drainage compared with the calibration study could be attributed to differences in simulated evapotranspiration and runoff. Comparing the simulated and calculated water balances and winter rye production of the calibration study with the current study, however, the effects of winter cover cropping practices during the 4-yr period at the study site since the model was calibrated have affected the amount of soil water available for drainage and NO₃ leaching at the depth of the drains.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • ET, evapotranspiration • NT, no-tillage • PET, potential evapotranspiration • RZWQM, Root Zone Water Quality Model