Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 May 2006
Published in Agron J 98:637-643 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0254
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Sorghum
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Soil Compaction
Right arrow Mechanical Impediance

Production Papers

Crop and Soil Response to Wheel-Track Compaction of a Claypan Soil

Daniel W. Sweeneya,*, M. B. Kirkhamb and J. B. Sissonc

a Kansas State Univ., Southeast Agric. Res. Center, P.O. Box 316, Parsons, KS 67357
b Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
c Real Life Enterprises, 9643 W. Compton Ct., Star, ID 83669

* Corresponding author (dsweeney{at}oznet.ksu.edu)

Received for publication September 2, 2005. Annual row crop production on the naturally occurring claypan soils of the eastern Great Plains may require field operations during somewhat wet conditions and this potentially results in soil compaction by the commonly-used, heavy-weight tractors and equipment. The objectives of this experiment were (i) to determine if compaction reduced yield and growth of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] grown on a claypan soil (fine, mixed, thermic Mollic Albaqualf) and (ii) to determine the effect of wheel tracks on selected soil properties and whether chisel plow tillage could reduce wheel-track compaction. Compaction treatments were (i) ALL—all of the plot compacted, (ii) WT—wheel-track compaction, (iii) WTC—wheel-track compaction followed by a chisel tillage operation, and (iv) NO—no intentional compaction. In general, it took until the third year of annually repeated compaction in the ALL treatment to reduce crop growth and yields compared with the NO compaction treatment. Even though nearly half of the area was compacted each year in the WT treatment, few measured crop parameters decreased. In wheel tracks, soil penetrometer resistance and bulk density increased and air permeability decreased compared with out of tracks. However, chisel tillage appeared to eliminate the compaction by reducing penetration resistance and bulk density and increasing air permeability to values similar to out of tracks. Thus, compaction of claypan soils may not often be a problem for producers in this area, especially if occasional chisel tillage is included to remove possible compacted zones.

Abbreviations: ALL, all of plot compacted • LAI, leaf area index • NO, no intentional compaction • WT, wheel-track compaction • WTC, wheel-track compaction followed by chisel plowing







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.