Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 April 2006
Published in Agron J 98:588-595 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0211
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farrer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pate, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farrer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pate, M. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Farrer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pate, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Wheat

Wheat

Delayed Harvest Effect on Soft Red Winter Wheat in the Southeastern USA

Dianne Farrera, Randy Weisza,*, Ronnie Heinigera, J. Paul Murphya and Michael H. Pateb

a Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
b Bay State Milling Co., 55 Franklin St., Winona, MN 55987

* Corresponding author (randy_weisz{at}ncsu.edu)

Received for publication July 15, 2005. Harvest of soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the southeastern USA can be delayed because of inclement weather or other unforeseen problems. Our objectives were to determine the impact of delaying harvest beyond grain ripeness (135 g kg–1 grain moisture content) on yield, test weight, grain protein, and 20 milling and baking quality parameters, and to determine if these impacts were correlated with environmental conditions occurring between grain ripeness and harvest. In 2001 and 2002, a total of six trials were conducted where treatments consisted of a timely harvest at grain ripeness and a delayed harvest, 8 to 19 d later. Yield was reduced by up to ~900 kg ha–1 due to delayed harvest, with yield losses negatively related to total precipitation and positively related to minimum daily temperatures (R2 = 0.99) during the delay interval, indicating that dry and warm environments increased yield losses. Test weight reductions up to ~115 kg m–3 were seen and were linearly related to the number of precipitation events (r2 = 0.93) between harvests. Grain protein was not affected by delayed harvest. Of the milling and baking quality parameters measured, grain and flour falling number, clear flour percentage, grain deoxynivalenol (DON), and farinograph breakdown times were negatively affected by delayed harvest. Lower falling numbers and higher levels of DON are consistent with the high humidity and rainfall typical of the southeastern USA wheat harvest and are problematic for millers. Decreased farinograph breakdown times can be a problem for bakers.

Abbreviations: DON, doxynivalenol • MTI, mixing tolerance index







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.