HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Howell, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Howell, T. A. Agricola Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Howell, T. A. Related Collections Sorghum Crop Models Irrigation

Modeling

Seeding Practices, Cultivar Maturity, and Irrigation Effects on Simulated Grain Sorghum Yield

USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Lab., P.O. Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012-0010

^* Corresponding author (rlbaumhardt{at}cprl.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication May 20, 2005. Grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is adapted for use in dryland and irrigated cropping systems on the southern High Plains. Irrigation in this region relies on the declining Ogallala aquifer, and applications are transitioning from full to deficit evapotranspiration replacement. Our objective was to identify optimum planting date, population, row spacing, and cultivar maturity combinations to maximize grain sorghum yield using the SORKAM model and long-term (1958–1999) weather records at Bushland, TX, for a Pullman soil (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) with reduced irrigation. Grain sorghum growth and yield was simulated under dryland and deficit- or full-irrigation conditions (rain + irrigation = 2.5 or 5.0 mm d^–1) for all combinations of planting date (15 May, 5 June, 25 June), cultivar maturity (early, 95 d; medium, 105 d; late, 120 d), population (12 and 16 plants m^–2), and row spacing (0.38 and 0.76 m). Simulated grain yield was unaffected by planting population but increased 7% for narrow compared with wide row spacing independent of other treatment effects. Results suggest two alternative management practices to optimize yield for the southern High Plains depending on potential irrigation capacity: (i) where rain plus supplemental irrigation was <0.2.5 mm d^–1, plant early-maturing cultivars during June and (ii) where rain plus supplemental irrigation approaches 5.0 mm d^–1, plant late-maturing cultivars on 15 May. Early-maturity cultivars planted on 5 June were better adapted to dryland and deficit irrigation for optimum grain yield on a southern High Plains Pullman soil.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration • HI, harvest index • I, irrigation • M, cultivar maturity • P, plant population • RW, row width • WUE, water use efficiency

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Baumhardt, S. A. Staggenborg, P. H. Gowda, P. D. Colaizzi, and T. A. Howell Modeling Irrigation Management Strategies to Maximize Cotton Lint Yield and Water Use Efficiency Agron. J., April 3, 2009; 101(3): 460 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. F. Heyduck, D. D. Baltensperger, L. A. Nelson, and R. A. Graybosch Yield and Agronomic Traits of Waxy Proso in the Central Great Plains Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 741 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Baumhardt, J. A. Tolk, T. A. Howell, and W. D. Rosenthal Sorghum Management Practices Suited to Varying Irrigation Strategies: A Simulation Analysis Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 665 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]