Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 April 2006
Published in Agron J 98:436-442 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0063
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duiker, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Duiker, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Duiker, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Residue management
Right arrow Other Soil Management
Right arrow Tillage

Production Papers

Tillage x Maize Hybrid Interactions

Sjoerd W. Duikera,*, James F. Haldeman, Jr.b and David H. Johnsonc

a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Pennsylvania State Univ., 116 ASI Building, University Park, PA 16802-3504
b The Monsanto Company, 269 Pine View Lane, York, PA 17403
c Pennsylvania State Univ. Southeast Agricultural Research and Extension Center, 1446 Auction Road, Manheim, PA 17545

* Corresponding author (swd10{at}psu.edu)

Received for publication March 2, 2005. Continuous maize (Zea mays L.) yields may be depressed with no-tillage (NT) compared with conventional chisel and disking systems (CD). Shallow or deep in-row tillage (ST and DT, respectively) may help alleviate this yield reduction, whereas some hybrids may be better adapted to NT. We therefore evaluated five maize hybrids with NT, ST, DT, and CD from 2002 to 2004 on a Hagerstown silt loam (fine, mixed, semiactive, mesic Typic Hapludalf) in southeastern Pennsylvania. Residue cover, penetration resistance, bulk density, and soil temperature were measured as well as maize emergence, mid-season height, and yield. Residue cover varied in the order NT > ST and DT > CD. Bulk density and penetration resistance in NT were higher than in ST, DT, and CD to the depth of tillage. In 2002, the average soil temperature during the first month after planting varied in the order NT < ST and DT < CD, but did not vary between tillage systems in 2004. Emergence was slower in NT than the other tillage systems in 2002 only. Emergence varied between hybrids, but there was no tillage x hybrid interaction. Mid-season maize height was not lower in NT than the other tillage systems. Tillage systems did not affect yield, and there was no tillage x hybrid interaction for yield, although some hybrids yielded better than others. The study suggests continuous maize yields with NT will be similar to tilled systems on well-drained soils in the northeastern USA and that tillage system is not important for hybrid selection.

Abbreviations: CD, chisel and disk tillage • DT, deep in-row tillage • NT, no-tillage • ST, shallow in-row tillage







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.