HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sanderson, M. A. Articles by Wachendorf, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sanderson, M. A. Articles by Wachendorf, M. Agricola Articles by Sanderson, M. A. Articles by Wachendorf, M. Related Collections Forage Management Grazing Management

Production Papers

Sward Structure of Simple and Complex Mixtures of Temperate Forages

^a USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Building 3702, Curtin Road, University Park, PA, 16802-3702
^b Dep. of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA, 16802
^c Univ. of Kiel, Germany

^* Corresponding author (mas44{at}psu.edu)

Received for publication June 9, 2005. Sward composition and structure influence herbage intake of grazing animals. We conducted a grazing study to examine how forage mixture complexity affected sward structure. Replicated 1-ha pastures (Hagerstown silt loam soil: fine, mixed, semiactive, mesic, Typic Hapludalf) were planted to either orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) and white clover (Trifolium repens L.) or a nine-species mixture [orchardgrass, tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.), white clover, alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), and chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)]. Pastures were stocked rotationally with lactating dairy cows (Bos taurus). Herbage mass, sward height, vertical structure, and nutritive value were measured pre- and postgrazing during four periods in each of 2002 and 2003. Pregrazing sward height was similar between the mixtures. Pregrazing herbage mass and sward bulk density were 30% less in the two-species mixture than the nine-species mixture in 2002 but similar in 2003. The nine-species mixture had more herbage dry matter in the upper sward layers than the two-species mixture. Bulk density of herbage dry matter increased and nutritive value decreased from the top to the bottom of both swards. Cattle grazed deeper into the two-species sward (18 cm) than the nine-species mixture (11 cm) in 2003; however, individual botanical components in the upper 25 cm of the canopy were removed similarly between treatments. We conclude that sward structure did not alter the pattern of herbage removal during grazing of simple or complex swards.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Biewer, T. Fricke, and M. Wachendorf Determination of Dry Matter Yield from Legume-Grass Swards by Field Spectroscopy Crop Sci., August 7, 2009; 49(5): 1927 - 1936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Sanderson, S. C. Goslee, K. D. Klement, and K. J. Soder Soil Seed Bank Composition in Pastures of Diverse Mixtures of Temperate Forages Agron. J., October 15, 2007; 99(6): 1514 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Brink, M. D. Casler, and M. B. Hall Canopy Structure and Neutral Detergent Fiber Differences among Temperate Perennial Grasses Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 2182 - 2189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]