Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 February 2006
Published in Agron J 98:231-237 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005-0012
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Labreveux, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Labreveux, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Labreveux, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Cropping Systems
Right arrow Grazing Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

Production Papers

Forage Chicory and Plantain

Nutritive Value of Herbage at Variable Grazing Frequencies and Intensities

María Labreveuxa,*, Matt A. Sandersonb and Marvin H. Hallc

a Dep. of Agric. and Nat. Res., Delaware State Univ., 1200 N. Dupont Hwy, Dover, DE 19901
b USDA-ARS Pasture Syst. and Watershed Manage. Res. Unit, Bldg. 3702 Curtin Rd., University Park, PA 16802-3702
c Crop and Soil Sci. Dep., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802

* Corresponding author (mlabreveux{at}desu.edu)

Received for publication January 9, 2005. Cultivars of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) and plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) grown in the northeastern USA have acceptable seasonal productivity; however, their reproductive habit could limit herbage nutritive value. The nutritive value of chicory and plantain cultivars was compared and examined under the effect of variable frequency and intensity of grazing. The cultivars were compared with ‘Pennlate’ orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), a productive grass during the summer, in two grazing experiments in 3 yr. Pre-grazing herbage samples were analyzed and compared for crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and in vitro true digestibility of dry matter (IVTD). In both experiments, the average CP of entries was 180 to 200 g kg–1, similar to orchardgrass. The NDF of forbs, which ranged from 300 to 400 g kg–1, was 200 g kg–1 lower than orchardgrass. The IVTD of chicory cultivars averaged 850 to 950 g kg–1. In Exp. 1, ‘Forage Feast’ and ‘Puna’ chicory had the greatest IVTD (5% greater than orchardgrass: average 911 vs. 867 g kg–1, respectively; P < 0.05). Lancelot plantain had the lowest IVTD in both experiments. Grazing management (frequency of grazing) affected nutritive value in Exp. 1 but not in Exp. 2. Although herbage composition in Exp. 2 varied, continuous reproductive development did not affect nutritive value. Managing Puna chicory and Lancelot plantain using a canopy-height based grazing system to maximize yield and persistence does not compromise nutritive value. Puna chicory could be a good complement to Pennlate orchardgrass in grass-based feeding systems.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.