Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 98:85-93 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0091
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scarbrough, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scarbrough, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, D. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scarbrough, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, D. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Forages

Nitrogen Partitioning and Estimates of Degradable Intake Protein in Wilting Orchardgrass and Bermudagrass Hays Damaged by Simulated Rainfall

D. A. Scarbrougha, W. K. Coblentzb,*, R. K. Ogdenb, J. E. Turnerc, J. B. Humphryb, K. P. Coffeyb, T. C. Danield, T. J. Sauere, J. A. Jenningsf and D. W. Kelloggb

a Dep. of Animal Science, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 (current address: 126 Jessie Dunn, Northwestern Oklahoma State Univ., Alva, OK 73717)
b Dep. of Animal Science, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
c Dep. of Animal Science, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 (current address: North Carolina State Univ. Mountain Res. Stn., Waynesville, NC 28786)
d Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
e USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., Ames, IA 50011
f Animal Science Section, Arkansas Coop. Ext. Service, Little Rock 72203. Contribution of the Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn

* Corresponding author (coblentz{at}uark.edu)

Received for publication March 28, 2005. This study investigated the effects of simulated rainfall on N partitioning and concentrations of degradable (DIP) or undegradable (UIP) intake protein for wilting orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) and bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] hays. Orchardgrass forage was wilted to 674, 153, or 41 g kg–1 of moisture (WET-O, IDEAL-O, and DRY-O, respectively) in the field before applying the simulated rainfall (0, 13, 25, 38, 51, 64, or 76 mm). For WET-O, DIP (g kg–1 crude protein [CP]) increased cubically (P = 0.020) with simulated rainfall, but the overall range of response was small (653–673 g kg–1 CP). Estimates of DIP (g kg–1 CP) for IDEAL-O and DRY-O decreased by 46 and 25 g kg–1 CP, respectively, between the 0- and 76-mm rainfall increments; for IDEAL-O, these decreases occurred in a linear (P < 0.0001) pattern, whereas quadratic (P = 0.009) and linear (P = 0.029) effects were observed for DRY-O. Bermudagrass forage was field wilted to 761, 400, or 130 g kg–1 of moisture (WET-B, MID-B, and IDEAL-B, respectively) and evaluated similarly. For WET-B and MID-B, DIP (g kg–1 CP) was not affected (P > 0.05) by simulated rainfall. In contrast, quartic (P = 0.019) and linear (P = 0.002) effects were observed for IDEAL-B, but these responses were confined primarily to changes between the undamaged (0-mm) control and the initial 13-mm rainfall increment. On a practical basis, concentrations of DIP were, at most, altered only moderately in response to simulated rainfall and relatively little when forages were still too wet to bale.

Abbreviations: AIRDRY, forages air-dried in wire cages for 48 h after application of simulated rainfall • ANOVA, analysis of variance • CP, crude protein • DIP, degradable intake protein • DRY, orchardgrass subjected to simulated rainfall at 41 g kg–1 of moisture • DM, dry matter • IDEAL, forages subjected to simulated rainfall at ideal moisture concentrations for baling (153 and 130 g kg–1 of moisture for orchardgrass and bermudagrass, respectively) • MID, bermudagrass subjected to simulated rainfall at the approximate midpoint of dehydration (400 g kg–1 of moisture) • NDIN, neutral detergent insoluble N • OVENDRY, forages oven-dried at 55°C after application of simulated rainfall • UIP, undegradable intake protein • WET, forage subjected to simulated rainfall immediately after mowing (674 and 761 g kg–1 of moisture for orchardgrass and bermudagrass, respectively)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
W. A. Phillips, B. N. Northup, and B. C. Venuto
Dry Matter Intake and Digestion of Perennial and Annual Cool-Season Grasses by Sheep
Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2009; 25(5): 610 - 618.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.