HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lambert, D. M. Articles by Malzer, G. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lambert, D. M. Articles by Malzer, G. L. Agricola Articles by Lambert, D. M. Articles by Malzer, G. L. Related Collections Economics Crop Rotation Systems Field-Scale Studies Spatial Variability Nutrient Management

Production Papers

Economic Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Patterns in Corn and Soybean Response to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

^a ERS-USDA, 1800 M St., N.W., Washington, DC 20036
^b Dep. of Agricultural Economics, Purdue Univ., 403 West State St., West Lafayette, IN 47907-20566
^c Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108

^* Corresponding author (dlambert{at}ers.usda.gov)

Received for publication January 3, 2005. Interactions among environmental factors, management decisions, and field characteristics cause temporal and spatial variability in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields. The objectives of this paper are (i) to test whether yield response of corn to N and P and of soybean to P are spatially and temporally stable, and (ii) to evaluate the profitability of a variable rate (VR) N and P fertility management strategy over a 5-yr, corn–soybean rotation using this response information. A field near Windom, MN, USA, was cropped with corn (1997, 1999, and 2001) and soybean (1998, 2000). Three replications of 13 N and P treatments were established in a split-plot arrangement of a randomized complete block design. Treatments were applied at constant rates in strips across the entire field. Fertilizer N treatments were 0, 67, 112, 157, and 202 kg ha^–1 and P treatments were 0, 56, and 112 kg P₂O₅ ha^–1. The field was partitioned into sub-blocks for spatial analysis of yield response. Corn and soybean response to these inputs was estimated for each block, each year. Results indicate that spatial variation of crop response to these inputs is significant, and that response of corn and soybean to P is temporally stable in some parts of the field, but not others. Response to N was not temporally stable. Results of an ex post profitability analysis found that average returns over the 5-yr period from the VR N and P management strategy were $28 ha^–1 higher than returns from a uniform application strategy.

Abbreviations: EOR, economically optimal rate • EONR, economically optimal rates for N • EORP, economically optimal rates for P • GEO, Geostatistic Regression Model • LM, Lagrange Multiplier • NPV, net present value • PSNT, Pre-Sidedress Nitrogen Test • SSM, site specific management • UNI, uniform application • VRA, variable rate application • VRN, variable rate nitrogen • VRT, variable rate technology • WF, whole field

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. M. Kyveryga, A. M. Blackmer, and T. F. Morris Disaggregating Model Bias and Variability when Calculating Economic Optimum Rates of Nitrogen Fertilization for Corn Agron. J., June 5, 2007; 99(4): 1048 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]