Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 January 2006
Published in Agron J 98:34-42 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004-0298
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alagarswamy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Alagarswamy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Alagarswamy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Models

Crop Models

Evaluating the CROPGRO–Soybean Model Ability to Simulate Photosynthesis Response to Carbon Dioxide Levels

G. Alagarswamya,*, K. J. Bootea, L. H. Allen, Jr.b and J. W. Jonesc

a Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0500
b USDA-ARS and Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0965
c Dep. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0570. Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Ser. no. R-10598

* Corresponding author (alagarsw{at}msu.edu)

Received for publication December 6, 2004. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration [CO2] will increase in the future and will affect global climate and ecosystem productivity. Crop models used in past assessments of climate change effect on ecosystem productivity have not been adequately tested for the ability to simulate ecosystem responses to [CO2]. Our objective was to evaluate the ability of the default CROPGRO–Soybean model to predict the responses of net leaf photosynthesis (A) and canopy photosynthesis (Acan) to photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) at different [CO2]. We also compared the default leaf photosynthesis equations in CROPGRO with the full Farquhar equations for ability to predict the response of A to [CO2]. Simulated and observed A and Acan were light saturated at 800 µmol m–2 s–1 PPF at ambient [CO2] but did not light saturate at PPF >1100 µmol m–2 s–1 at elevated [CO2]. Observed and simulated A responded asymptotically to increasing intercellular [CO2]. The CROPGRO default photosynthesis equations and the Farquhar equations simulated A equally well at all [CO2]. Doubled [CO2] increased simulated A by 52% and Acan by 42%; these values are close to the increases of 39 to 48% for A and 59% for Acan reported in the literature. Root mean square errors for simulated A and Acan were low, and Willmott's index of agreement ranged from 0.86 to 0.99, confirming that the CROPGRO model with default photosynthesis equations can be used to evaluate potential effects of [CO2] on soybean photosynthesis and productivity.

Abbreviations: LAI, leaf area index • MSE, mean squared error • MSEs, systematic mean squared error • MSEu, unsystematic mean squared error • PPF, photosynthetic photon flux • QE, quantum efficiency • RuBP, ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate • RMSE, root mean squared error







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.