|
|
||||||||
a USDA-ARS-JPCNRCC, Watkinsville, GA 30677
b Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7274
c Usda-Ars-Grl, El Reno, Ok 73036
d Usda-Ars-Ngprl, Mandan, Nd 58554
e USDA-NRCS-ITC, Fort Collins, CO 80526-8121
f Dupont Research, Wilmington, DE 19898
g Biol. and Agric. Eng. Dep., Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223-1797
* Corresponding author (dstark{at}uga.edu)
Received for publication June 15, 2004.
Calibration procedures and data used to parameterize a model, including model components that may or may not have been addressed, are generally not well documented in modeling studies. A comprehensive description of the process and parameters used for calibrating the Root Zone Water Quality Model, v. 1.3.2004.213, is presented in this article. The model was calibrated to simulate tile drainage and leached nitrate under conventional tillage management practices for maize (Zea mays L.) production followed by a rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop in Cecil soils (kaolinitic, thermic, Typic Kanhapludults), and for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) development in the Georgia Piedmont. Tile drainage and nitrate leaching were simulated within 15% of the observed values in the calibrated maize scenarios with and without the soil macroporosity option. Simulated and observed tile drainage and leached nitrate were not significantly different, and the simulated values were not significantly different with and without the macroporosity option. Simulated cotton biomass and leaf area index were well correlated with observed biomass and leaf area index until the last 21 d of the reproductive stage. Simulated and observed cotton water use were different by <1 mm d1 based on
soil water in a 60-cm profile during the critical peak bloom period. A detailed analysis of the calibration procedure and parameters used in this study will aid subsequent users of the model as well as aid in a subsequent evaluation of the model's performance for simulations of tile drainage and nitrate leaching in Georgia Piedmont cotton production systems.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval CT, conventional tillage EF, tile drain express fraction LAB, sorptivity factor for lateral infiltration MSEA, management system evaluation areas NT, no tillage PTFs, pedotransfer functions RRMSE, relative root mean square error TDR, time domain reflectometry WT, wetting thickness
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sophocleous, M. A. Townsend, F. Vocasek, L. Ma, and A. KC Soil Nitrogen Balance under Wastewater Management: Field Measurements and Simulation Results J. Environ. Qual., April 27, 2009; 38(3): 1286 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.A. Abrahamson, H.J. Causarano, J.R. Williams, M.L. Norfleet, and A.J. Franzluebbers Predicting soil organic carbon sequestration in the southeastern United States with EPIC and the soil conditioning index Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, March 1, 2009; 64(2): 134 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Abrahamson, D. E. Radcliffe, J. L. Steiner, M. L. Cabrera, D. M. Endale, and G. Hoogenboom Evaluation of the RZWQM for Simulating Tile Drainage and Leached Nitrate in the Georgia Piedmont Agron. J., May 3, 2006; 98(3): 644 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||