HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson-Nistler, C. M. Articles by Cash, S. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Johnson-Nistler, C. M. Articles by Cash, S. D. Agricola Articles by Johnson-Nistler, C. M. Articles by Cash, S. D. Related Collections Forage Management Agricultural Pesticides Alfalfa Pest Management Systems

Production Papers

Considerations Related to Richardson's Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus richardsonii) Control in Montana

Ext. Serv., Anim. and Range Sci. Dep., Montana State Univ., P.O. Box 172900, Bozeman, MT 59717-2900

^* Corresponding author (nistler{at}montana.edu)

Received for publication September 2, 2004. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) production is limited in Montana due to activities associated with Richardson's ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii), and control is often considered to be cost prohibitive. This study was conducted to document the economic impact of ground squirrel activities on alfalfa yield and demonstrate field efficacy of available toxicants. Montana alfalfa producers completed a survey to determine perceived severity and losses due to ground squirrels. Actual first-harvest forage yield losses were determined at two locations in southwest Montana in 2003 and 2004 using cage exclosures. Chlorophacinone (Rozol), diphacinone (Ramik-Green), and zinc phosphide were administered at two locations to determine the efficacy of each treatment. Survey results across Montana indicate alfalfa producers estimate a 24% average reduction in forage yield in areas known to be infested with ground squirrels. First-cut forage yields were reduced by 31% in southwest Montana. Rozol was the most effective control agent (84% efficacy) while Ramik-Green was the least effective control agent in our trials (29% efficacy). Landowner perceptions of ground squirrel damage are similar to actual yield reduction and possibly underestimated. The costs associated with the control of ground squirrels can be quite high, and caution must be exercised when implementing a new control program to assure these costs are offset by forage gained.

Abbreviations: MSU, Montana State University