HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kladivko, E. J. Articles by Santini, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kladivko, E. J. Articles by Santini, J. B. Agricola Articles by Kladivko, E. J. Articles by Santini, J. B. Related Collections Water Management Crop Growth and Development Soil Hydrology Maize Production Agriculture Maize Management

Production Papers

Corn Growth and Yield Response to Subsurface Drain Spacing on Clermont Silt Loam Soil

Dep. of Agron., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907

^* Corresponding author (kladivko{at}purdue.edu)

Received for publication March 28, 2005. Subsurface drainage is an important water management practice on naturally poorly drained soils, and recommendations for appropriate drain spacings for particular soils continue to evolve. The objective of this long-term study was to measure corn (Zea mays L.) growth and yield as affected by subsurface drain spacing on a soil that was traditionally not tile drained. Three drain spacings (5, 10, and 20 m) were compared with a nondrained "control" (40 m) for plant population, grain yield, and moisture content over a 10-yr period on a low-organic-matter silt loam soil. In addition, corn populations, heights at 4 and 8 wk, yield, and moisture were measured with distance from the drain for the 5-, 10-, and 20-m spacings. Significant distance effects occurred more frequently for the 20-m spacing than for the 10- and 5-m spacings, especially for grain yield and moisture. The 10-yr average corn yields were 9.8, 9.7, 9.5, and 9.2 Mg ha^–1 for the 5-, 10-, and 20-m plots and the nondrained control plots, respectively. Grain yield was 1.3 to 1.7 Mg ha^–1 lower in the nondrained control than in the 5-m spacing in 3 of the 10 yr and was likely due to both planting date delays and wetter soil conditions after planting. The smaller-than-expected yield differences among treatments may reflect the excellent surface drainage in this field as well as optimal planting dates in 7 of the 10 years. The results demonstrate that drainage improvements are a long-term investment and may not provide yield benefit in every year.

Abbreviations: SEPAC, Southeast Purdue Agricultural Center