Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 19 September 2005
Published in Agron J 97:1374-1379 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.0267
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wanjura, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wanjura, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wanjura, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Crop Models

Modeling

Modification of the GRAMI Model for Cotton

Jonghan Ko*, Stephan J. Maas, Robert J. Lascano and Donald Wanjura

USDA-ARS Plant Stress and Water Conserv. Unit, Plant and Soil Sci., Texas Tech Univ., 3810 4th St., Lubbock, TX 79415

* Corresponding author (jko{at}lbk.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication October 20, 2004. A new version of the GRAMI crop model capable of being calibrated within season was developed and tested for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production in semiarid regions. The model was first verified using field data obtained at Halfway, TX, USA in 2002. The model was then validated using data sets obtained at Lamesa, TX in 1999 and 2001 and at Lubbock, TX in 2002 and 2004. Simulated values of cotton growth and lint yield showed reasonable agreement with corresponding measurements under irrigated conditions. The new model not only has simple input requirements but is also easy to use. Thus, it promises to have applicability to be expanded to other semiarid regions for irrigated cotton production and to have applicability to regional cotton growth monitoring and lint yield mapping projects.

Abbreviations: AGDM, aboveground dry mass • GC, ground cover • GDD, growing degree days • LAI, leaf area index • LEPA, low-energy precision application • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • RMSE, root mean squared error




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. Ko, S. J. Maas, S. Mauget, G. Piccinni, and D. Wanjura
Modeling Water-Stressed Cotton Growth Using Within-Season Remote Sensing Data
Agron. J., October 31, 2006; 98(6): 1600 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.