HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Powell, G. W. Articles by Bork, E. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Powell, G. W. Articles by Bork, E. W. Agricola Articles by Powell, G. W. Articles by Bork, E. W. Related Collections Crop Physiology & Metabolism Alfalfa Agroforestry Crop Ecology

Integrated Agricultural Systems

Simulated Aspen Understory Microclimate Effects on Alfalfa Growth

^a British Columbia Agroforestry Industry Dev. Initiative, c/o P.O. Box 4261, Quesnel, BC, Canada V2J 3J3
^b Dep. of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Ag/For Centre, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2P5

^* Corresponding author (george_powell{at}uniserve.com)

Received for publication February 10, 2005. Understory plant growth in agroforestry systems is strongly influenced both positively and negatively by the microclimate created by the overstory. Growth chambers were used to isolate and compare the effects of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and humidity (and resultant leaf/atmosphere vapor pressure differences) on the early growth and development of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Leaf temperature corresponded closely to air temperature and did not vary between humidity treatments. Predictably, PAR had a strong effect on alfalfa growth with significant effects on the size and mass of all yield components, as well as relative growth rates. Humidity effects were less pronounced, although still significantly increased total alfalfa leaf area (24–30%), stem mass (17–42%), shoot mass (13–33%), and height (23–24%). Increased leaf area was attributed to 21 to 25% greater leaf numbers rather than area per leaf. Unlike the effects of PAR, elevated humidity did not increase the stem mass/length ratio, indicating the increased stem mass was due primarily to stem lengthening, and not thickening or increased tissue density. In general, humidity had small, positive effects on alfalfa growth, but was strongly expressed only within variables positively affected by PAR. This is consistent with the theory that the primary benefit of humidity is through enhanced photosynthetic gas exchange. Results suggest elevated humidity under aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) appears to compensate for some lost growth potential in the understory, but cannot fully counteract the reduced photosynthetic potential of alfalfa at the two PAR levels tested.

Abbreviations: APL, area per leaf • C3 plant, plants exclusively utilizing the Calvin cycle for photosynthesis • D, leaf/atmosphere vapor pressure difference • LS, leaf/stem ratio • N–P–K, nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • R/FR, ratio of red to far-red wavelengths • RGR_H, relative height growth • RH, relative humidity • SLW, specific leaf weight • SML, stem mass/length ratio • SR, shoot/root mass ratio • T, temperature

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W. Hancock and C. T. Dougherty Relationships between Blue- and Red-based Vegetation Indices and Leaf Area and Yield of Alfalfa Crop Sci., November 7, 2007; 47(6): 2547 - 2556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]