HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schwarte, A. J. Articles by Jannink, J.-L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schwarte, A. J. Articles by Jannink, J.-L. Agricola Articles by Schwarte, A. J. Articles by Jannink, J.-L. Related Collections Forage Management Sustainable Agriculture Crop Rotation Systems Nitrogen Other Forage Crops Crop Systems

Production Papers

Planting Date Effects on Winter Triticale Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation

^a Dep. of Agron., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
^b USDA-ARS Natl. Soil Tilth Lab., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (lgibson{at}iastate.edu)

Received for publication January 7, 2005. Addition of triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) into more diversified cropping systems could provide valuable economic and environmental benefits to producers in the U.S. Corn and Soybean Belt. To maximize triticale value, research was conducted to identify planting dates that allowed maximum dry matter production and N capture. Winter triticale was planted at 10-d intervals from 15 September to 15 October at three Iowa locations: central, northeast, and southwest for two growing seasons: 2002–2003 and 2003–2004. Aboveground dry matter production, N concentration, and N removal were greater at southwest Iowa than central and northeast Iowa. Dry matter production decreased as planting was delayed from late September to late October. Nitrogen accumulation at any time during the spring and summer was greater for September- than October-planted triticale in 2002–2003. At the end of the 2002–2003 season, mid-September-planted triticale had accumulated 37% more N than mid-October-planted triticale. In 2003–2004, total N capture occurring by early May was less for late-October-planted triticale than the other three planting dates, but there were no differences in N capture among the four planting dates from late May until maturity. Dry matter production was greatest when at least 300 growing degree days (GDDs) (base 4°C) accumulated between planting and 31 December. These results suggest that triticale should be planted in September to maximize spring forage yield and N accumulation although later planting dates would provide a higher quality forage if harvest was not delayed into late spring and summer.

Abbreviations: GDD, growing degree day

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Carley, D. L. Jordan, L. C. Dharmasri, T. B. Sutton, R. L. Brandenburg, and M. G. Burton Peanut Response to Planting Date and Potential of Canopy Reflectance as an Indicator of Pod Maturation Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 376 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Nance, L. R. Gibson, and D. L. Karlen Soil Profile Nitrate Response to Nitrogen Fertilization of Winter Triticale Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 29, 2007; 71(4): 1343 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Subedi, B. L. Ma, and A. G. Xue Planting Date and Nitrogen Effects on Grain Yield and Protein Content of Spring Wheat Crop Sci., January 22, 2007; 47(1): 36 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Gibson, C. D. Nance, and D. L. Karlen Winter Triticale Response to Nitrogen Fertilization when Grown after Corn or Soybean Agron. J., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 49 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]