Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 13 July 2005
Published in Agron J 97:1245-1251 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.0321
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pettigrew, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Young, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pettigrew, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Young, L. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pettigrew, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Young, L. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity

Production Papers

Potassium Fertilization Effects on Cotton Lint Yield, Yield Components, and Reniform Nematode Populations

W. T. Pettigrew*, W. R. Meredith, Jr. and L. D. Young

USDA-ARS, Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, P.O. Box 345, Stoneville, MS 38776

* Corresponding author (bpettigrew{at}ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication December 29, 2004. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lint yields have not changed appreciably during the last decade. Because more and higher infestations of reniform nematodes (Rotylenchulus reniformis) have been identified in mid-southern USA fields, this nematode might be a mitigating factor in the cotton yield stagnation. The objectives were to determine how varying rates of K fertilization interacted with different cotton genotypes to influence dry matter partitioning, lint yield, fiber quality, and reniform nematode populations. Nine cotton genotypes were grown in the field under two levels of K fertilization (0 and 112 kg K ha–1) and two levels of aldicarb [2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde 0-methylcarbamoyloxime] application (0 and 1.68 kg a.i. ha–1) from 1999 through 2001. Reniform nematode numbers and aboveground dry matter partitioning were determined at various times in the growing season. Lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality were determined at the end of the season. Cotton grown with K fertilization hosted a 12% larger post-harvest population of reniform nematode than the unfertilized control plants. Plants grown without K fertilization averaged a 10% greater specific leaf weight than the K fertilized plants. Of the 9 genotypes grown, only PayMaster 1218BR increased lint yield (10%) in response to K fertilization. An interaction between aldicarb application and K fertilization for lint yield during the 2000 growing season indicated that both reniform nematode parasitism and insufficient K fertilization may impose limitations to lint yield production. Large reinform nematode populations may be suppressing the yield response to K fertilization. Production practices that encourage robust plant growth may enhance proliferation of existing reniform nematode populations.

Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting • LAI, leaf area index • SLW, specific leaf weight




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. Clement-Bailey and C. O. Gwathmey
Potassium Effects on Partitioning, Yield, and Earliness of Contrasting Cotton Cultivars
Agron. J., June 26, 2007; 99(4): 1130 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.