HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sinclair, T. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sinclair, T. R. Agricola Articles by Sinclair, T. R. Related Collections Water Stress Hydraulic Conductivity Evapotranspiration Analytical Solutions Water Flow Models

Drought

Theoretical Analysis of Soil and Plant Traits Influencing Daily Plant Water Flux on Drying Soils

Agron. Physiol. Lab., P.O. Box 110965, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0965

^* Corresponding author (trsincl{at}ifas.ufl.edu)

Received for publication November 21, 2004. Experimental evidence has been accumulating for a number of years that daily transpiration rates respond to the progressive drying of soil in a similar manner across a wide range of conditions when expressed as a function of available volumetric soil water content. There is little decrease in gas exchange until only about one-third of the available soil water remains in the soil, and then gas exchange decreases in a nearly linear manner until the available soil water is exhausted. There exists no theoretical derivation that explicitly provides a basis for explaining the consistency in this response observed over a wide range of conditions. A relatively simple derivation is presented by defining plant water flux on drying soil relative to a plant on well-watered soil and by examining the response in the relevant range of soil volumetric water content. This derivation resulted in a relatively simple expression that predicted daily transpiration rate response to drying soil that was consistent with experimental observations. Further, the results of this analysis showed the response was essentially independent of root length density, transpiration rate, and soil depth. Also, large decreases in soil hydraulic conductivity as the soil dries had only modest influences on the daily transpiration rate response. Expression of relative transpiration as a function of volumetric soil water content available to support transpiration also minimized the influence of soil texture on the overall response of water flux to drying soil. The derivation offers a theoretical basis to explain the stability in daily transpiration response to drying soil that has been observed over a wide range of conditions.

Abbreviations: FTSW, fraction of transpirable soil water • RT, relative daily transpiration rate

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Metselaar and T. R. Sinclair Comment on "Theoretical Analysis of Soil and Plant Traits Influencing Daily Plant Water Flux on Drying Soils" by T.R. Sinclair. Agron. J. 97:1148-1152 (2005) Agron. J., June 26, 2007; 99(4): 1188 - 1189. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Baker, D. C. Gitz, P. Payton, D. F. Wanjura, and D. R. Upchurch Using Leaf Gas Exchange to Quantify Drought in Cotton Irrigated Based on Canopy Temperature Measurements Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 637 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Metselaar and Q. de Jong van Lier The Shape of the Transpiration Reduction Function under Plant Water Stress Vadose Zone J., January 24, 2007; 6(1): 124 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]