HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Karlen, D. L. Articles by Rippke, G. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Karlen, D. L. Articles by Rippke, G. R. Agricola Articles by Karlen, D. L. Articles by Rippke, G. R. Related Collections Best Management Practices Nitrogen Maize

Nitrogen Management

Corn Response to Late-Spring Nitrogen Management in the Walnut Creek Watershed

^a USDA-ARS Natl. Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011-4420
^b Dep. Agric. and Biosyst. Eng., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (karlen{at}nstl.gov)

Received for publication October 7, 2004. A 400-ha subbasin study within the Walnut Creek watershed near Ames, IA, confirmed that using late-spring soil nitrate nitrogen (NO₃–N) test (LSNT) fertilizer recommendations could significantly reduce NO₃–N loss in drainage water, but detailed crop response was not reported. Herein we summarize corn (Zea mays L.) response to the LSNT program when implemented across the Clarion–Nicollet–Webster soil association. The LSNT was used to determine the recommended N fertilizer rate that was applied uniformly across each field except on check strips where zero or nonlimiting (>220 kg N ha^–1) sidedress N was applied. Leaf chlorophyll (SPAD) readings, end-of-season stalk nitrate concentrations, and grain yield and quality (protein, starch, and oil content) showed significant year, field, soil map unit and N rate response. Average grain yield with the LSNT program was significantly lower than the nonlimiting rate in 1997 and 1998 but not in 1999 or 2000. This suggests that although watershed-scale implementation of the LSNT can reduce nitrate loss through drainage water, it may also increase producer risk, especially when above-normal rainfall occurs shortly after the sidedress N fertilizer is applied. To encourage adoption of the LSNT program for its water quality benefits, we suggest that federal, state, or private agencies develop affordable risk insurance or some other financial incentives to help producers minimize the potential crop risk associated with this program.

Abbreviations: GPS, global positioning system • LSNT, late-spring nitrate test

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Barbieri, H. E. Echeverria, and H. R. Sainz Rozas Presidedress Soil Nitrogen Test for No-Tillage Maize at Different Row Spacing Agron. J., June 23, 2008; 100(4): 1101 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Sainz Rozas, P. A. Calvino, H. E. Echeverria, P. A. Barbieri, and M. Redolatti Contribution of Anaerobically Mineralized Nitrogen to the Reliability of Planting or Presidedress Soil Nitrogen Test in Maize Agron. J., June 16, 2008; 100(4): 1020 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Simpson, A. N. Sharpley, R. W. Howarth, H. W. Paerl, and K. R. Mankin The New Gold Rush: Fueling Ethanol Production while Protecting Water Quality J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 318 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Grandy, G. P. Robertson, and K. D. Thelen Do Productivity and Environmental Trade-offs Justify Periodically Cultivating No-till Cropping Systems? Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1377 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]