|
|
||||||||
a USDA-ARS, Northern Plains Agric. Res. Lab., 1500 N. Central Ave., Sidney, MT 59270
b Dep. of Crop Sci., 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
c Dep. of Nat. Resour. and Environ. Sci., 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
* Corresponding author (bstevens{at}sidney.ars.usda.gov)
Received for publication December 15, 2003. Increased fertilizer N uptake efficiency (FNUE) leads to more economical corn (Zea mays L.) production and lower environmental impact. Excessive N application reduces FNUE and may affect subsequent crop response through its influence on NO3N carryover and the amount of readily mineralizable organic N in the soil. Our objective was to determine how prior fertilizer N application rate affects (i) grain yield and agronomic optimum N rate, (ii) contributions of fertilizer- and soil-derived N to N uptake, and (iii) FNUE. Labeled 15NH415NO3 was applied at 0, 67, 134, 201, or 268 kg N ha1 to subplots within a continuous corn long-term N rate study. Estimates of FNUE were higher by the difference method (4969%) than with the isotope (15N) method (3137%), and different trends were observed with each method as N application rate increased. The disparity between methods is consistent with a differential effect of long-term N application rate on mineralizationimmobilization. Recovery of labeled N from the plantsoil system ranged from 71% at the 67 kg ha1 N application rate to 64% at the 201 kg ha1 application rate. Fertilizer N accounted for an increasing proportion of crop N uptake as the N rate was increased, but soil N uptake was always more extensive, accounting for 54 to 83% of total plant N. Crop uptake of labeled N during the second growing season after 15N application ranged from 2.2 kg ha1 with the lowest N rate to 7.8 kg ha1 with the two highest rates.
Abbreviations: AE, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency ANI, added nitrogen interaction FNUE, fertilizer nitrogen uptake efficiency FNUEdiff, fertilizer nitrogen uptake efficiency calculated using the difference method FNUE15N, fertilizer nitrogen uptake efficiency calculated using the 15N isotope method NY, yield-based optimum N application rate UMRB, Upper Mississippi River Basin YMAX, predicted maximum yield Y0, grain yield produced on plots where no N was applied
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L. Mulvaney, S. A. Khan, and T. R. Ellsworth Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers Deplete Soil Nitrogen: A Global Dilemma for Sustainable Cereal Production J. Environ. Qual., October 29, 2009; 38(6): 2295 - 2314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Gentry, M. B. David, F. E. Below, T. V. Royer, and G. F. McIsaac Nitrogen Mass Balance of a Tile-drained Agricultural Watershed in East-Central Illinois J. Environ. Qual., July 23, 2009; 38(5): 1841 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nyiraneza, A. N'Dayegamiye, M. H. Chantigny, and M. R. Laverdiere Variations in Corn Yield and Nitrogen Uptake in Relation to Soil Attributes and Nitrogen Availability Indices Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 21, 2009; 73(1): 317 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Schlesinger On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen PNAS, January 6, 2009; 106(1): 203 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Khan, R. L. Mulvaney, T. R. Ellsworth, and C. W. Boast The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1821 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||