HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Winter, S. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Winter, S. R. Agricola Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Winter, S. R. Related Collections Sorghum

Agronomic Modeling

Seeding Practices and Cultivar Maturity Effects on Simulated Dryland Grain Sorghum Yield

^a USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Lab., P.O. Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012-0010
^b Retired, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., 2300 Experiment Station Rd., Bushland, TX 79012

^* Corresponding author (rlbaumhardt{at}cprl.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication March 30, 2004. Typical planting recommendations for dryland grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in the southern High Plains are to delay until soil water is adequate for crop establishment, but no population or cultivar maturity class are specified. Our objectives were to use the SORKAM simulation model, long-term (1958–1998) weather records at Bushland, TX, and known Pullman soil (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustolls) properties to identify an optimum planting date, population, row spacing, and cultivar maturity combination to maximize dryland grain sorghum yield. We simulated sorghum grain yields for combinations of planting dates (15 May, 5 June, and 25 June), populations (3, 6, and 12 plants m^–2), row spacings (0.38 and 0.76 m), and cultivar maturity class (early, medium, and late). SORKAM consistently (r² = 0.69, RMSE = 792 kg ha^–1) simulated grain yields that averaged about 5% more than measured values and correctly simulated row width and population effects on yield. Simulated grain yields increased with narrow row-spacing 9%, independent of planting date or cultivar. Increasing plant population significantly decreased panicle seed number, seed mass, and plant tillers; however, the simulated grain yield was unchanged (3996–4106 kg ha^–1) by plant populations. Mean simulated grain yields were greatest for the 5 June planting dates with early and medium maturity cultivars that avoided late summer heat or water deficit stresses and matured before freezing weather. Our results show early or medium maturity cultivars, planted 5 June, in 0.38-m row widths, using 3 or 6 plants m^–2, achieve the greatest dryland grain yield on a southern High Plains clay loam soil.

Abbreviations: CM, cultivar maturity • D, planting date • HI, harvest index (kg kg^–1) • P, plant population • RW, row width • SM, seed mass (mg seed^–1)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Baumhardt, J. A. Tolk, T. A. Howell, and W. D. Rosenthal Sorghum Management Practices Suited to Varying Irrigation Strategies: A Simulation Analysis Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 665 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Bandaru, B. A. Stewart, R. L. Baumhardt, S. Ambati, C. A. Robinson, and A. Schlegel Growing Dryland Grain Sorghum in Clumps to Reduce Vegetative Growth and Increase Yield Agron. J., June 27, 2006; 98(4): 1109 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Baumhardt and T. A. Howell Seeding Practices, Cultivar Maturity, and Irrigation Effects on Simulated Grain Sorghum Yield Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 462 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]