|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Plant, Soil, and Insects Sci., Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-9294
b Dep. of Agron. and Range Sci., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616-8515
* Corresponding author (masoud{at}psis.umass.edu)
Received for publication October 1, 2003. Plants grown at noncompetitive densities (isolated plants) can be used to relate competitive pressure on yield and yield components at high plant densities. The main objective of this research was to quantify the sensitivity of grain yield and its components to manipulation of crowding stress in corn (Zea mays L.). The experiment was conducted in Deerfield, MA (1986, 1987, and 2000), and Shoush, Iran (1998 and 1999). Three single-ear corn hybrids were planted at six densities (0.25, 3, 4.5, 6, 9, and 12 plants m2), the lowest density being considered an isolated density. The higher three densities (6, 9, and 12 plants m2) were combined with three removal treatments, consisting of removal of alternate plants in rows at different stages of growth. Intensity of competition was quantified by comparing grain yield and its components of plants in these densities with those of isolated plants. The highest grain yield in all experimental sites was obtained from 9 plants m2 and for total biomass yield between 9 and 12 plants m2. Kernel yield per plant decreased linearly in all hybrids as plant density intensified. All yield components had a linear decline in response to increased competition pressure. The reduction in kernel yield was attributed most to the reduction in number of kernels per row. Removal treatments indicated that early competition during vegetative growth had no or little effect on final grain yield. Plant competition between the vegetative stage and anthesis had a large effect on grain yield reduction, which ranged from 8 to 21% in different hybrids and experimental sites. Increased assimilate supply through plant removal again confirmed that adjustments in grain yield occurred primarily through kernel number per row.
Abbreviations: DAE, days after emergence GDD, growing degree days (base temperature of 10°C) R0, no removal R1, R2, and R3, removal during vegetative growth, 50% tassel emergence, and early grain-filling stages, respectively
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. C. Mason, D. Kathol, K. M. Eskridge, and T. D. Galusha Yield Increase Has Been More Rapid for Maize than for Grain Sorghum Crop Sci., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 1560 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sarlangue, F. H. Andrade, P. A. Calvino, and L. C. Purcell Why Do Maize Hybrids Respond Differently to Variations in Plant Density? Agron. J., June 5, 2007; 99(4): 984 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.R. Kiniry, L. Echarte, and A. Hashemi Comments on "Yield Response of Corn to Crowding Stress" by Hashemi et al. (Agron. J. 97:839-846) Agron. J., September 19, 2005; 97(5): 1472 - 1472. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||