HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhuang, J. Articles by Butler, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Zhuang, J. Articles by Butler, C. M. Agricola Articles by Zhuang, J. Articles by Butler, C. M. Related Collections Forage Management Economics Symbiosis Grazing Management Other Forage Crops

Production Papers

Economic Analysis of Replacing Endophyte-Infected with Endophyte-Free Tall Fescue Pastures

^a Dep. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 456B Mechanical Engineering Bldg., 1513 University Ave., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1572
^b Dep. of Agricultural Economics, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0276
^c Dep. of Plant Pathology, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0312
^d Unified Foodservice Purchasing Coop., 12000 West Hwy 42, Goshen, KY 40026

^* Corresponding author (jzhuang{at}wisc.edu)

Received for publication April 23, 2004. Cattle (Bos taurus) consuming tall fescue pastures infected with the endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum often suffer physiological disorders that reduce animal performance. One solution is to replace endophyte-infected tall fescue pastures with an endophyte-free mixture. A benefit-cost analysis was conducted to determine the profitability of pasture restoration. The profitability of this action depends on the percentage of endophyte in existing pastures, the discount rate, stand life of the endophyte-free tall fescue variety, pasture stocking rates, product price, baseline calving rates, and the initial investment of replacement. In our benefit-cost analysis, assuming the stand life of endophyte-free tall fescue is 12 yr and the stocking rate is 1.20 head ha^–1, we determined a critical infestation level of 74%. Thus, under these conditions pasture replacement should be profitable if, in the existing pastures, >74% of the fescue plants are infected with toxic endophyte. In sensitivity analyses, realistic variations in the discount rate, pasture stand life, stocking rate, product price, baseline calving rate, and initial investment of replacement generated new net present values and critical infestation levels. The most influential variable was the stocking rate. The critical infestation level decreased dramatically to 25% at a stocking rate of 4.0 head ha^–1 and increased dramatically to 93% at a stocking rate of 0.82 head ha^–1. Since infestation levels are often >70%, these results imply that for many livestock producers pasture replacement might be profitable compared with retaining endophyte-infected fescue stands.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Beck, S. A. Gunter, K. S. Lusby, C. P. West, K. B. Watkins, and D. S. Hubbell III Animal performance and economic comparison of novel and toxic endophyte tall fescues to cool-season annuals J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 2043 - 2055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]