Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 April 2005
Published in Agron J 97:705-710 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.0102
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Licht, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Kaisi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Licht, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Kaisi, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Licht, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Kaisi, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Use
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Water Content
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Tillage

Production Papers

Corn Response, Nitrogen Uptake, and Water Use in Strip-Tillage Compared with No-Tillage and Chisel Plow

Mark A. Licht and Mahdi Al-Kaisi*

Dep. of Agron., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011-1010

* Corresponding author (malkaisi{at}iastate.edu)

Received for publication April 13, 2004. Tillage systems are among the many factors that affect soil productivity. The challenges associated with different tillage systems have prompted the need to compare corn (Zea mays L.) production under strip-tillage (ST), chisel plow (CP), and no-tillage (NT) systems. The study was conducted on two Iowa State University Research and Demonstration Farms in 2001 and 2002. One site was at the Agronomy Research and Demonstration Farm near Ames, IA, where the soils were Nicollet loam (Aquic Hapludolls) and Webster silty clay loam (Typic Haplaquolls). The second site was at the Northeast Research and Demonstration Farm near Nashua, IA, where the soils were Kenyon loam (Typic Hapludolls) and Floyd loam (Aquic Hapludolls). Corn final emergence rate index was slightly higher in ST than either NT or CP. Grain yield, dry matter production, and N uptake were generally similar in the three tillage systems. Soil moisture storage in the 0- to 30- and 0- to 120-cm soil depths and grain water use efficiency show no significant differences between tillage systems. It was apparent that after 2 yr of ST, there were limited advantages for ST when compared with either NT or CP.

Abbreviations: CP, chisel plow • ERI, emergence rate index • NT, no-tillage • ST, strip-tillage • WUE, water use efficiency




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. Al-Kaisi and D. Kwaw-Mensah
Effect of Tillage and Nitrogen Rate on Corn Yield and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Uptake in a Corn-Soybean Rotation
Agron. J., October 15, 2007; 99(6): 1548 - 1558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. D. Halvorson, A. R. Mosier, C. A. Reule, and W. C. Bausch
Nitrogen and Tillage Effects on Irrigated Continuous Corn Yields
Agron. J., January 3, 2006; 98(1): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.