HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Viator, R. P. Articles by Wells, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Viator, R. P. Articles by Wells, R. Agricola Articles by Viator, R. P. Articles by Wells, R. Related Collections Crop Growth and Development Cotton

Cotton

Predicting Cotton Boll Maturation Period Using Degree Days and Other Climatic Factors

^a Dep. of Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
^b Current address: USDA-ARS Southern Regional Res. Cent., Sugarcane Res. Unit, 5883 USDA Rd, Houma, LA 70360

^* Corresponding author (rviator{at}srrc.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication March 29, 2004. Degree days are often used for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth monitoring and management. The objectives of this research are to determine if 15.5°C is an accurate lower-threshold temperature to monitor the boll maturation period (BMAP) for cotton in the northern, rainfed region of the U.S. Cotton Belt, to investigate other climatic factors in this cotton region that may improve the accuracy of the current degree day system for cotton, and to evaluate degree day models that include both an upper- and lower-threshold temperature. Cotton was planted at three different timings in 2001 and 2002 to provide different climatic regimes during the BMAP. On 10 typical plants per plot, all first-position flowers were individually tagged with date of flower opening and were then harvested at full maturity. Daily weather data consisted of maximum, minimum, and average air temperature; maximum and average soil temperature; average soil moisture; maximum and average solar radiation; and maximum and average photosynthetically active radiation. The 17°C degree day model, which used 17°C as the lower threshold, provided the best adjusted r² (0.2715) of all the single-variable models; the degree day 15.5°C model had an adjusted r² of 0.2276. The best model using both upper and lower temperature thresholds was DD3017, using 30 and 17°C as the thresholds, and had an adjusted r² of 0.2452. Adding average, minimum, and maximum air temperatures to the DD15.5, DD17, and DD3017 models reduced coefficient of variation and mean square error and increased adjusted r² values.

Abbreviations: AAT, average air temperature • APAR, average photosynthetically active radiation • ASM, average soil moisture • AST, average soil temperature • ASUN, average solar radiation • BMAP, boll maturation period • CV, coefficient of variation • DDx, degree days calculated with base x°C • MNAT, minimum air temperature • MSE, mean square error • MXAT, maximum air temperature • MXPAR, maximum photosynthetically active radiation • MXST, maximum soil temperature

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Carley, D. L. Jordan, L. C. Dharmasri, T. B. Sutton, R. L. Brandenburg, and M. G. Burton Peanut Response to Planting Date and Potential of Canopy Reflectance as an Indicator of Pod Maturation Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 376 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]