Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Havlin, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Havlin, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Havlin, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Published in Agron. J. 97:391-398 (2005).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

Symposium Papers

Challenging Approaches to Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations in Continuous Cropping Systems in the Great Plains

Alan J. Schlegela,*, Cynthia A. Grantb and John L. Havlinc

a Southwest Res.-Ext. Cent., Kansas State Univ., Tribune, KS 67879
b Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon Res. Cent., Brandon, MB
c Dep. of Soil Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC

* Corresponding author (schlegel{at}ksu.edu)

Received for publication April 12, 2004. Cropping systems in the Great Plains have evolved over the past two decades from reliance on summer fallowing to continuous cropping under reduced or no-tillage. Most N recommendation models were developed in fallow systems under conventional tillage and were based on average yield goal, with adjustments for soil profile N content. The objective of this review is to examine the impact of continuous cropping on N requirements. With high-residue continuous cropping systems, N requirements may increase because of increased annualized production, reduced contribution of N mineralization, and increased immobilization and volatilization potential of surface-applied fertilizer N. Mitigating these effects on N availability and supplemental N requirements are the reduction in yield per crop, reduced nitrate (NO3) leaching potential, increased N use efficiency (NUE), and increased rates of N mineralization due to higher soil organic matter (OM) content. Unfortunately, increased year-to-year yield variability with continuous cropping increases the difficulty in accurately estimating yield goals. Also, reducing the frequency and duration of fallow may reduce the usefulness of the preplant soil N tests in estimating N availability. Recent research has evaluated the use of optical sensors during the growing season to assess N stress and to estimate crop N requirements. If proved feasible for many crops, this would provide a drastic change for determining N recommendations. In the absence of a reasonable yield goal and known residual soil N content, a fertilizer N rate near 70 kg N ha–1 or less was generally sufficient to optimize small-grain or oilseed yields in several continuous cropping studies.

Abbreviations: CC, continuous corn • NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index • NUE, nitrogen use efficiency • OM, organic matter • PSNT, presidedress nitrate test • SF, grain sorghum–fallow • SS, continuous grain sorghum • WCF, wheat–corn–fallow • WF, wheat–fallow • WSF, wheat–grain sorghum–fallow • WW, continuous wheat




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. M. Carr, Glenn. B. Martin, and R. D. Horsley
Wheat Grain Quality Response to Tillage and Rotation with Field Pea
Agron. J., October 21, 2008; 100(6): 1594 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. T. Berti, B. L. Johnson, R. W. Gesch, and F. Forcella
Cuphea Nitrogen Uptake and Seed Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 628 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. E. Blackshaw
Nitrogen Fertilizer, Manure, and Compost Effects on Weed Growth and Competition with Spring Wheat
Agron. J., November 17, 2005; 97(6): 1612 - 1621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.