|
|
||||||||
a Southwest Res.-Ext. Cent., Kansas State Univ., Tribune, KS 67879
b Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon Res. Cent., Brandon, MB
c Dep. of Soil Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC
* Corresponding author (schlegel{at}ksu.edu)
Received for publication April 12, 2004. Cropping systems in the Great Plains have evolved over the past two decades from reliance on summer fallowing to continuous cropping under reduced or no-tillage. Most N recommendation models were developed in fallow systems under conventional tillage and were based on average yield goal, with adjustments for soil profile N content. The objective of this review is to examine the impact of continuous cropping on N requirements. With high-residue continuous cropping systems, N requirements may increase because of increased annualized production, reduced contribution of N mineralization, and increased immobilization and volatilization potential of surface-applied fertilizer N. Mitigating these effects on N availability and supplemental N requirements are the reduction in yield per crop, reduced nitrate (NO3) leaching potential, increased N use efficiency (NUE), and increased rates of N mineralization due to higher soil organic matter (OM) content. Unfortunately, increased year-to-year yield variability with continuous cropping increases the difficulty in accurately estimating yield goals. Also, reducing the frequency and duration of fallow may reduce the usefulness of the preplant soil N tests in estimating N availability. Recent research has evaluated the use of optical sensors during the growing season to assess N stress and to estimate crop N requirements. If proved feasible for many crops, this would provide a drastic change for determining N recommendations. In the absence of a reasonable yield goal and known residual soil N content, a fertilizer N rate near 70 kg N ha1 or less was generally sufficient to optimize small-grain or oilseed yields in several continuous cropping studies.
Abbreviations: CC, continuous corn NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index NUE, nitrogen use efficiency OM, organic matter PSNT, presidedress nitrate test SF, grain sorghumfallow SS, continuous grain sorghum WCF, wheatcornfallow WF, wheatfallow WSF, wheatgrain sorghumfallow WW, continuous wheat
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. M. Carr, Glenn. B. Martin, and R. D. Horsley Wheat Grain Quality Response to Tillage and Rotation with Field Pea Agron. J., October 21, 2008; 100(6): 1594 - 1599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Berti, B. L. Johnson, R. W. Gesch, and F. Forcella Cuphea Nitrogen Uptake and Seed Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 628 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Blackshaw Nitrogen Fertilizer, Manure, and Compost Effects on Weed Growth and Competition with Spring Wheat Agron. J., November 17, 2005; 97(6): 1612 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||