|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., Box 9555, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
b USDA-ARS, Crop Sci. Res. Lab., P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, MS 39762
* Corresponding author (krreddy{at}ra.msstate.edu)
Received for publication January 8, 2004. Leaf N and chlorophyll (Chl) concentrations of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) are important indicators of plant N status. Laboratory determinations of plant tissue N are time consuming and costly. Measurements of leaf reflectance may provide a rapid and accurate means of estimating leaf N and Chl. Studies were conducted to determine the relationships between leaf hyperspectral reflectance (4002500 nm) and Chl or N concentration in field-grown cotton. One study consisted of four N rates of 0, 56, 112, and 168 kg N ha1, and another study consisted of four mepiquat chloride (MC) rates of 0, 0.59, 1.17, and 2.34 L MC ha1. Chlorophyll and N concentrations and reflectance of uppermost, fully expanded mainstem leaves were measured throughout the growing seasons. Reflectance at 556 and 710 nm increased significantly as N fertilizer rate decreased. Averaged across years and sampling dates, the percentage increase in reflectance at these two wavelengths was 8, 10, and 19% greater in the 112, 56, and 0 kg N ha1 treatments, respectively, compared with the 168 kg N ha1 treatment. The effect of MC on leaf reflectance was more complex than the N effect. In both the N and MC studies, a linear relationship was found between leaf N and a simple ratio of leaf reflectance at 517 and 413 nm (R517/R413) (r2 = 0.650.78***). Leaf Chl concentration was associated closely with reflectance ratios of either R708/R915 or R551/R915 (r2 = 0.670.76***). Our results suggest leaf reflectance can be used for real-time monitoring of cotton plant N status and N fertilizer management in the field.
Abbreviations: Chl, chlorophyll DAS, days after sowing DW, dry weight FF, first flower FS, first square MC, mepiquat chloride Ri, reflectance at i nanometers RD, reflectance difference RS, reflectance sensitivity
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Biewer, T. Fricke, and M. Wachendorf Development of Canopy Reflectance Models to Predict Forage Quality of Legume-Grass Mixtures Crop Sci., August 7, 2009; 49(5): 1917 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Blackburn Hyperspectral remote sensing of plant pigments J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2007; 58(4): 855 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Starks, D. Zhao, W. A. Phillips, and S. W. Coleman Development of Canopy Reflectance Algorithms for Real-Time Prediction of Bermudagrass Pasture Biomass and Nutritive Values Crop Sci., February 24, 2006; 46(2): 927 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||