Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanier, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lanier, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, P. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lanier, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, P. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Legumes
Right arrow Symbiosis
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Published in Agron. J. 97:79-84 (2005).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

Production Papers

Peanut Response to Inoculation and Nitrogen Fertilizer

James E. Lanier, David L. Jordan*, Janet F. Spears, Randy Wells and P. Dewayne Johnson

Department of Crop Science, Box 7620, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620

* Corresponding author (david_jordan{at}ncsu.edu)

Received for publication February 5, 2004. Experiments were conducted from 2000 through 2003 in North Carolina to compare peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) response to inoculation with Bradyrhizobium. In one study that included 20 experiments, peanut pod yield was compared following no inoculation or inoculation with commercial granular or liquid in-furrow products. In six of these experiments, inoculant was also applied to the seed before planting. In six other experiments within this study, pod yield of inoculated and noninoculated peanut was determined following surface applications of N approximately 40 d after planting. In a second study, peanut pod yield was compared in twin row planting patterns (two rows spaced 18 cm apart on 91-cm centers) when inoculant was applied in-furrow to one of the twin rows or to both of the twin rows. In a third study, interactions of in-furrow inoculation and fumigation with metam sodium were compared. Peanut pod yield was higher following inoculation in 7 of 20 experiments. In six of the seven experiments where a yield response to inoculation was observed, peanut had not been planted previously in these fields. In experiments where peanut responded positively to inoculant, pod yield was higher when inoculant was applied in the seed furrow rather than to seed before planting. Nitrogen increased pod yield linearly in three of six experiments (p ≤ 0.05). Inoculating both rows of peanut seeded in twin row patterns yielded higher in two of four experiments than when one of the twin rows was inoculated or when inoculant was not included. Fumigation with metam sodium did not affect pod yield, regardless of inoculation treatment.

Abbreviations: SNF, symbiotic nitrogen fixation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.