HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lindquist, J. L. Articles by Dobermann, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lindquist, J. L. Articles by Dobermann, A. Agricola Articles by Lindquist, J. L. Articles by Dobermann, A. Related Collections Agroclimatology Crop Growth and Development Best Management Practices Carbon Sequestration Maize Crop Models Crop Ecology

Agronomic Modeling

Maize Radiation Use Efficiency under Optimal Growth Conditions

Dep. of Agron. and Hortic., Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, P. O. Box 83095, Lincoln NE 68583-0915

^* Corresponding author (jlindquist1{at}unl.edu)

Received for publication March 15, 2004. Accurate measurement of crop growth and radiation use efficiency (RUE) under optimal growth conditions is required to predict plant dry matter accumulation and grain yield near the genetic growth potential. Research was conducted to quantify the biomass and leaf area index (LAI) accumulation, extinction coefficient, and RUE of maize (Zea mays L.) under conditions of optimal growth. Maize was grown in two environments over five growing seasons (1998–2002). Total aboveground biomass at maturity ranged from 2257 g m^–2 in 1998 to 2916 g m^–2 in 2001; values that are considerably greater than the biomass achieved in most previous studies on RUE in maize. Peak LAI ranged from 4.8 to 7.8. Maize extinction coefficients during vegetative growth (k) were within the range of recently published values (0.49 ± 0.03), with no clear pattern of differences in k among years. Seasonal changes in interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) were similar across all but one year. Estimates of RUE were obtained using the short-interval crop growth rate method and the cumulative biomass and absorbed PAR (APAR) method. Values of RUE obtained using the two methods were 3.74 (±0.20) g MJ^–1 APAR and 3.84 (±0.08) g MJ^–1 APAR, respectively, and did not vary among years. This compares to a published mean RUE for maize of 3.3 g MJ^–1 of intercepted PAR (Mitchell et al., 1998). Moreover, RUE did not decline during grain filling. Differences in biomass accumulation among years were attributed in part to differences in observed radiation interception, which varied primarily due to differences in LAI. Maize simulation models that rely on RUE for biomass accumulation should use an RUE of 3.8 g MJ^–1 APAR for predicting optimum yields without growth limitations.

Abbreviations: APAR, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation • CGR, crop growth rate • DOY, day of year • DVS, development stage • IPAR, intercepted photosynthetically active radiation • k, extinction coefficient • LAI, leaf area index • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • RUE, radiation use efficiency

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. J. Causarano, P. C. Doraiswamy, G. W. McCarty, J. L. Hatfield, S. Milak, and Alan. J. Stern EPIC Modeling of Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Croplands of Iowa J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2008; 37(4): 1345 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Amos and D. T. Walters Maize Root Biomass and Net Rhizodeposited Carbon: An Analysis of the Literature Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 3, 2006; 70(5): 1489 - 1503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]