HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Snapp, S. S. Articles by O'Neil, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Snapp, S. S. Articles by O'Neil, K. Agricola Articles by Snapp, S. S. Articles by O'Neil, K. Related Collections Ecosystem Management Crop Rotation Systems Cover Crops

Production Papers

Evaluating Cover Crops for Benefits, Costs and Performance within Cropping System Niches

^a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
^b Dep. of Agric. Economics, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
^c W.K. Kellogg Biological Stn., Michigan State Univ. Ext., Land and Water Program, Hickory Corners, MI 49060

^* Corresponding author (snapp{at}msu.edu)

Received for publication March 26, 2004. The integration of cover crops into cropping systems brings costs and benefits, both internal and external to the farm. Benefits include promoting pest-suppression, soil and water quality, nutrient cycling efficiency, and cash crop productivity. Costs of adopting cover crops include increased direct costs, potentially reduced income if cover crops interfere with other attractive crops, slow soil warming, difficulties in predicting N mineralization, and production expenses. Cover crop benefits tend to be higher in irrigated systems. The literature is reviewed here along with Michigan farmer experience to evaluate promising cover crop species for four niches: Northern winter (USDA Hardiness Zones 5–6), Northern summer (Zones 5–6), Southern winter (Zones 7–8), and Southern summer (Zones 7–8). Warm season C₄ grasses are outstanding performers for summer niches (6–9 Mg ha^–1), and rye (Secale cereale L.) is the most promising for winter niches (0.8–6 Mg ha^–1) across all hardiness zones reviewed. Legume–cereal mixtures such as sudangrass (Sorghum sudanese L.)–cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) are the most effective means to produce substantial amounts (28 Mg ha^–1) of mixed quality residues. Legume covers are slow growers and expensive to establish. At the same time, legumes fix N, produce high quality but limited amounts (0.5–4 Mg ha^–1) of residues, and enhance beneficial insect habitat. Brassica species produce glucosinolate-containing residues (2–6 Mg ha^–1) and suppress plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-borne disease. Legume cover crops are the most reliable means to enhance cash crop yields compared with fallows or other cover crop species. However, farmer goals and circumstances must be considered. If soil pests are a major yield limiting factor in cash crop production, then use of brassica cover crops should be considered. Cereal cover crops produce the largest amount of biomass and should be considered when the goal is to rapidly build soil organic matter. Legume–cereal or brassica–cereal mixtures show promise over a wide range of niches.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. H. Heggenstaller, R. P. Anex, M. Liebman, D. N. Sundberg, and L. R. Gibson Productivity and Nutrient Dynamics in Bioenergy Double-Cropping Systems Agron. J., November 7, 2008; 100(6): 1740 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Singer Corn Belt Assessment of Cover Crop Management and Preferences Agron. J., October 21, 2008; 100(6): 1670 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Snapp, R. Price, and M. Morton Seed Priming of Winter Annual Cover Crops Improves Germination and Emergence Agron. J., September 8, 2008; 100(5): 1506 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Smith, F. D. Menalled, and G. P. Robertson Temporal Yield Variability under Conventional and Alternative Management Systems Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1629 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.C. Kaspar, D.B. Jaynes, T.B. Parkin, and T.B. Moorman Rye Cover Crop and Gamagrass Strip Effects on NO3 Concentration and Load in Tile Drainage J. Environ. Qual., August 31, 2007; 36(5): 1503 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Nyiraneza and S. Snapp Integrated Management of Inorganic and Organic Nitrogen and Efficiency in Potato Systems Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 9, 2007; 71(5): 1508 - 1515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Sulc and B. F. Tracy Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in the U.S. Corn Belt Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 335 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Singer, K. A. Kohler, and P. B. McDonald Self-Seeding Winter Cereal Cover Crops in Soybean Agron. J., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 73 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chen, D. L. Wyse, G. A. Johnson, P. M. Porter, S. R. Stetina, D. R. Miller, K. J. Betts, L. D. Klossner, and M. J. Haar Effect of Cover Crops Alfalfa, Red Clover, and Perennial Ryegrass on Soybean Cyst Nematode Population and Soybean and Corn Yields in Minnesota Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1890 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. E. Miguez and G. A. Bollero Winter Cover Crops in Illinois: Evaluation of Ecophysiological Characteristics of Corn Crop Sci., May 18, 2006; 46(4): 1536 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Cherr, J. M. S. Scholberg, and R. McSorley Green Manure Approaches to Crop Production: A Synthesis Agron. J., February 7, 2006; 98(2): 302 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Andraski and L. G. Bundy Cover Crop Effects on Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen on an Irrigated Sandy Soil Agron. J., July 13, 2005; 97(4): 1239 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]