Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Industrial Wastes
Right arrow Alfalfa
Right arrow Sulfur
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant Nutrition
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Industrial Waste
Published in Agron. J. 97:265-271 (2005).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

Production Papers

Flue Gas Desulfurization Products as Sulfur Sources for Alfalfa and Soybean

Liming Chena, Warren A. Dicka,* and Sid Nelson, Jr.b

a School of Nat. Resour., The Ohio State Univ., Wooster, OH 44691
b Sorbent Technol. Corp., 1664 East Highland Rd., Twinsburg, OH 44087

* Corresponding author (dick.5{at}osu.edu)

Received for publication April 7, 2004. Sulfur deficiencies in soil are expected to increase due to growth of high-yielding crop varieties, use of S-free fertilizers, and removal of S from industrial emissions. Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) products, created when coal is burned and SO2 is removed from the flue gases, may serve as efficient S sources. However, there are few reports on their use for the enhancement of crop growth. Agricultural gypsum and two types of FGD products, that contain either vermiculite or perlite, were applied at 0, 16, and 67 kg S ha–1 to an agricultural soil (Wooster silt loam, Typic Fragiudalf). Dry weight of a new planting of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) was increased up to 40% by the treatments of FGD products or gypsum compared with the untreated control. Gypsum and FGD products were also applied at 0, 8, 16, and 24 kg S ha–1 to five established alfalfa stands in different Ohio regions. Mean alfalfa yield was significantly (P ≤ 0.05 ) increased by approximately 5.0% in 2001 and 6.0% in 2002 with the S treatments of FGD products or gypsum compared with the untreated control. Alfalfa yields for FGD products and gypsum treatments were similar. A slight positive yield response was observed for soybean (Glycine max L.) when soils were treated with S-containing materials. Soil and plant analyses were made to assess potential adverse environmental impacts and none were observed. Thus, these FGD products can be safely applied to agricultural soils as S sources and can improve alfalfa yields in S-deficient soils.

Abbreviations: FGD, flue gas desulfurization • ICP, inductively coupled plasma




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. Chen, D. Kost, and W. A. Dick
Flue Gas Desulfurization Products as Sulfur Sources for Corn
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1464 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.