|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Agronomy, North Florida Res. and Educ. Center, Univ. of Florida, 155 Research Rd., Quincy, FL 32351
b Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Florida Res. and Educ. Center, Univ. of Florida, 155 Research Rd., Quincy, FL 32351
* Corresponding author (pjwiatrak{at}mail.ifas.ufl.edu)
Received for publication March 22, 2004. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) forage yield and quality can be affected by management of the previous crop. The objective of this study was to evaluate two tillage systems [no-till (NT) and conventional (CT)] and residual response to four N rates (0, 67, 134, and 202 kg ha1) applied to the previous cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crop. The experiment was conducted on a Dothan sandy loam (fine, loamy siliceous, thermic Plinthic Kandiudults) in 19951996 and 19961997. Greater wheat dry matter yields were obtained from CT than NT in 19951996 (6.3 and 5.4 Mg ha1, respectively), while tillage did not influence yields in 19961997 (7.5 and 8.0 Mg ha1 for CT and NT, respectively). Wheat yields were not influenced by N application to the previous cotton crop. The in vitro organic matter digestion (IVOMD) was not influenced by tillage or N application to the previous cotton crop. With increasing N application to a previous cotton crop, neutral detergent fiber (NDFt) and neutral detergent ash-free (NDFaf) increased in wheat forage under CT and decreased in NT. Nitrogen concentration of wheat increased with N application to the previous crop. Concentration of P was greater from CT than NT in 19951996, while tillage did not influence P concentration in 19961997 growing season. Increasing N application rates to the previous crop decreased NDFt and NDFaf in wheat grown in NT and increased N concentration in dry matter of wheat grown in both tillage systems. Generally, NT is a viable option for growing wheat forage following cotton.
Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage IVOMD, in vitro organic matter digestion NDFaf, neutral detergent fiber ash-free NDFt, neutral detergent fiber on a DM basis NT, no-till ST, strip till
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. T. Bowman, P. A. Beck, K. B. Watkins, M. M. Anders, M. S. Gadberry, K. S. Lusby, S. A. Gunter, and D. S. Hubbell Tillage Systems for Production of Small-Grain Pasture Agron. J., August 11, 2008; 100(5): 1289 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Dhima, I. Vasilakoglou, A. Lithourgidis, S. Papadopoulou, and I. Eleftherohorinos Tillage System Effects on Competition between Barley and Sterile Oat Agron. J., June 5, 2006; 98(4): 1023 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||