HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, C. Articles by Knox, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Chen, C. Articles by Knox, M. Agricola Articles by Chen, C. Articles by Knox, M. Related Collections Forage Management Intercropping Systems Other Forage Crops Nitrogen

Production Papers

Row Configuration and Nitrogen Application for Barley–Pea Intercropping in Montana

^a Central Agric. Res. Center, Montana State Univ., HC90 Box 20, Moccasin, MT 59462
^b Western Agric. Res. Center, Montana State Univ., 580 Quast Lane, Corvallis, MT 59828

^* Corresponding author (cchen{at}montana.edu)

Received for publication January 7, 2004. Intercropping barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with Austrian winter pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L. Poir) may increase the use efficiencies of growth resources and reduce fertilizer N requirements. The objectives of this study were to determine (i) row configuration and (ii) fertilizer N effects on yield, protein content, and the land equivalent ratio (LER) of barley–pea intercropping systems. A 3-yr barley–pea intercropping study was conducted at the Western and Central Agricultural Research Centers (WARC and CARC) of Montana State University from 2000 to 2002 with three row configurations (4 rows barley x 4 rows pea, 2 rows barley x 2 rows pea, and barley–pea mixed within rows) and three N application treatments (0, 67, and 134 kg N ha^–1). Barley biomass production increased 41% at WARC and CARC, whereas pea biomass production decreased 34% at WARC and 46% at CARC with the row configuration changing from the 4 x 4 to the mixed configuration. The LER ranged from 1.05 to 1.24 on a biomass basis and from 1.05 to 1.26 on a protein basis, indicating a production advantage of intercropping. Barley is a more competitive component than pea. Separated row arrangements are advantageous where the desired outcome is a greater pea component in the harvested forage, but the mixed arrangement has a greater total biomass yield and LER. Fertilizer N increased total biomass yield and protein level in barley–pea intercrops, but high N rates could decrease the LER and result in toxic levels of nitrate in the forage.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • ANOVA, analysis of variance • CARC, Central Agricultural Research Center • LER, land equivalent ratio • MS, mean square • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • RCB, randomized complete block • WARC, Western Agricultural Research Center

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Chen, P. Miller, F. Muehlbauer, K. Neill, D. Wichman, and K. McPhee Winter Pea and Lentil Response to Seeding Date and Micro- and Macro-Environments Agron. J., October 31, 2006; 98(6): 1655 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Szumigalski and R. C. Van Acker Nitrogen Yield and Land Use Efficiency in Annual Sole Crops and Intercrops Agron. J., June 5, 2006; 98(4): 1030 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]