|
|
||||||||
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., 2014D Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506
* Corresponding author (rlamond{at}bear.agron.ksu.edu)
Received for publication September 22, 2003. High residue levels provide excellent erosion control but can result in cool, wet seedbeds creating a situation where starter fertilizer may be beneficial. Research was conducted from 1999 to 2001 evaluating N rates in starter containing N, P, K, and sometimes S; and different starter fertilizer placements for continuous no-till corn (Zea mays L.). Placements consisted of direct seed contact, dribble over-the-row, and a subsurface band (5 cm below and 5 cm to the side of the seed row). Nitrogen rates for direct seed and dribble placements were 11, 22, 45, and 56 kg N ha1; and 34, 67, 101, and 134 kg N ha1 for the subsurface placement. Nitrogen was balanced at 168 kg ha1 on all treatments, including a no-starter check using broadcast ammonium nitrate at planting. Addition of S in starter was evaluated with subsurface placement. Starter fertilizer, regardless of placement, often increased early season dry matter production and significantly increased grain yields. Increasing N above 22 kg ha1 in direct seed contact did not increase yields and significantly reduced stands 2 of 3 yr. Stands were unaffected with higher N rates in dribble over-the-row and subsurface placements; however, applying N above 11 and 34 kg ha1, respectively, resulted in little added yield benefit. Inclusion of 11 kg S ha1 in a subsurface starter fertilizer sometimes increased early season dry matter production, grain yield, and nutrient uptake. Results suggest starter fertilizer is an effective, efficient way of stimulating early growth and improving yields of continuous no-till corn in Kansas.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Lawrence, Q. M. Ketterings, and J. H. Cherney Effect of Nitrogen Application on Yield and Quality of Silage Corn after Forage Legume-Grass Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 73 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Grandy, G. P. Robertson, and K. D. Thelen Do Productivity and Environmental Trade-offs Justify Periodically Cultivating No-till Cropping Systems? Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1377 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Grandy, T. D. Loecke, S. Parr, and G. P. Robertson Long-term trends in nitrous oxide emissions, soil nitrogen, and crop yields of till and no-till cropping systems. J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1487 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Wortmann, S. A. Xerinda, M. Mamo, and C. A. Shapiro No-Till Row Crop Response to Starter Fertilizer in Eastern Nebraska: I. Irrigated and Rainfed Corn Agron. J., January 5, 2006; 98(1): 156 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Wortmann, S. A. Xerinda, and M. Mamo No-Till Row Crop Response to Starter Fertilizer in Eastern Nebraska: II. Rainfed Grain Sorghum Agron. J., January 5, 2006; 98(1): 187 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||