HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J. Articles by Stuedemann, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J. Articles by Stuedemann, J. A. Agricola Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J. Articles by Stuedemann, J. A. Related Collections Forage Management Grazing Management Other Forage Crops Production Agriculture Animal Waste

Pasture Management and Forage Utilization

Bermudagrass Management in the Southern Piedmont USA

X. Coastal Productivity and Persistence in Response to Fertilization and Defoliation Regimes

USDA-ARS, 1420 Experiment Station Rd., Watkinsville, GA 30677-2373

^* Corresponding author (afranz{at}uga.edu)

Received for publication November 12, 2003. Productivity, quality, and persistence of ‘Coastal’ bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] pastures are affected by fertilization, but possible interactions with defoliation regime including animal grazing are not fully known. We evaluated three sources of fertilization with equivalent N rates [inorganic, crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) cover crop plus inorganic, and chicken (Gallus gallus) broiler litter] factorially arranged with four defoliation regimes [unharvested, cattle (Bos taurus) grazing to maintain high (4.5 ± 1.6 Mg ha^–1) and low (2.5 ± 1.1 Mg ha^–1) forage mass, and hayed monthly] on estimated forage dry matter production, forage and surface residue C/N ratio, and ground cover of pastures on a Typic Kanhapludult in Georgia during 5 yr. Mean annual forage dry matter production was 7.5 ± 0.7 Mg ha^–1 with hay harvest but declined (1.3 Mg ha^–1 yr^–1) significantly with time as a result of lower precipitation. With grazing, estimated production was 8.3 ± 1.0 Mg ha^–1 and did not change with time, suggesting that grazing cattle sustained forage productivity by recycling nutrients and creating better surface soil conditions. Coastal bermudagrass as a percentage of ground cover (initially 81%) declined 5 ± 2% yr^–1 with unharvested and grazing to maintain low forage mass, declined 3 ± 1% yr^–1 with haying, and remained unchanged (–1 ± 1% yr^–1) with grazing to maintain high forage mass. Pastures with high forage mass were more productive than with low forage mass (9.2 ± 1.6 vs. 7.5 ± 1.1 Mg ha^–1) from a forage sustainability perspective, primarily by avoiding encroachment of undesirable plant species.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Stuedemann and A. J. Franzluebbers Cattle performance and production when grazing Bermudagrass at two forage mass levels in the southern Piedmont J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1340 - 1350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Franzluebbers and J. A. Stuedemann Bermudagrass Management in the Southern Piedmont USA: VII. Soil-Profile Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 4, 2005; 69(5): 1455 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]