Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Meek, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Meek, D. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Meek, D. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Published in Agron. J. 96:1382-1389 (2004).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

Production Paper

Repeated Biomass Removal Affects Soybean Resource Utilization and Yield

Jeremy W. Singer* and David W. Meek

USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2150 Pammel Drive, Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author (singer{at}nstl.gov)

Received for publication February 10, 2004. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] producers in many regions of the USA are confronted with significant yield losses because of crop damage from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Our objectives were to quantify soybean resource utilization and yield responses to variety, row spacing, and simulated repeated biomass removal. Field research was conducted in 2000 and 2001 on a Quakertown silt loam soil (fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludult) near Pittstown, NJ. Biomass removal during early vegetative and vegetative/reproductive growth extended the soil wetness duration index on average by 1.5 and 2.9 d compared with the control from the 0- to 30- and 30- to 60-cm soil depths in 2000 and by 5.1 and 2.1 d in 2001. Biomass removal during early vegetative growth delayed pod maturity up to 7 d compared with the control, but biomass removal during reproductive growth hastened pod maturity by as much as 3 d. Averaged across row spacing and biomass removal, variety ‘APK394NRR’ yielded 12 and 24% lower than ‘93B53’ in 2000 and 2001. In 2000, averaged across variety and biomass removal, the 20- and 41-cm row widths yielded 19 and 16% less than the 76-cm row width. Averaged across variety and row spacing, all biomass removal treatments lowered yield compared with the control except the midvegetative/early reproductive treatment in 2001 (661 vs. 663 g m–2). The greatest yield reductions occurred (up to 89%) when biomass was removed repeatedly during vegetative and reproductive growth. Management implications for soybean producers include variety selection and row spacing to diminish the effects of deer damage.

Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting • LAI, leaf area index • MG, maturity group • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. W. Meek and J. W. Singer
ESTIMATION OF DURATION INDICES FOR REPEATED TENSIOMETER READINGS
Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1787 - 1790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.