Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feyerherm, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Feyerherm, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, A. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Feyerherm, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, A. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Crop Models
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Right arrow Statistics
Published in Agron. J. 96:992-996 (2004).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

STATISTICS

A Statistical Method for Summarizing Results of Cultivar Performance Trials

A. M. Feyerherm*, G. M. Paulsen and A. K. Fritz

Dep. of Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506

* Corresponding author (amfeyer{at}ksu.edu).

Received for publication March 24, 2003. Cultivars in yield trials are normally compared by means and ranks, but extrapolating results to the future is difficult because good estimates of variances are lacking. The purpose of this research was to construct and apply a statistical method capable of producing probabilistic inferences about future yielding ability from a sample of cultivar performance trials (CPTs). Our database was CPTs of fall- and spring-planted wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the U.S. Great Plains. The mean yield of selected check cultivars that were common to a set of trials established the standard level of performance for each trial in that set. Differences in yields between other cultivars and the trial standard provided the differential yielding ability (DYA) values for those cultivars in that trial. Cultivars were judged by their performance in relation to check cultivars in a sample composed of trials from multiple locations over multiple seasons within an ecogeographic region. We assumed that environmental effects were random from trial to trial and DYA values were normally and independently distributed. This led to use of Student's t distribution for probabilistic inference about population mean DYA values. We applied our method to elite trials in several regions in our database. For each cultivar, we showed its mean DYA, standard error, and p value when testing the null hypothesis. The method can be applied to advancing generations of experimental lines in breeding trials as well as recommending late generations for release as new cultivars.

Abbreviations: CPT, cultivar performance trial • df, degrees of freedom • DYA, differential yielding ability • SE, standard error







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.