|
|
||||||||
CSIRO Plant Industry, Cotton Research Unit, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia
* Corresponding author (warwick.stiller{at}csiro.au).
Received for publication December 16, 2002. Worldwide, unreliable rainfall is the primary limitation to dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields. Adaptation to these water stress environments has been and still is an important component of many crop improvement programs. This paper summarizes the results of cultivar experiments across three sites and six seasons comparing irrigated and dryland environments in Australia, with the objective of determining the extent of irrigation x cultivar interactions for yield and fiber quality, the effect maturity and leaf type have on those interactions, and the implications this has for a breeding program. On average, dryland cotton yielded 48% of irrigated cotton, and fiber lengths were 4% shorter. There was a significant irrigation x cultivar interaction, with two okra leaf cultivars yielding relatively more under dryland conditions. This interaction varied with site, suggesting that the number of dryland sites utilized in the breeding program could be increased, and consistency of cultivar rankings each season indicated the number of testing seasons could be decreased. It was also concluded that selection under dryland conditions would be beneficial. The data from these experiments indicated a yield penalty for early maturing cultivars under dryland conditions in these environments. There was a strong positive association between maturity and lint yield, with an increase of 34.4 kg lint ha1 for every day delay in maturity. Agronomic water use efficiency (WUE) varied among cultivars, with a full-season okra leaf cultivar, Siokra L23, having the highest WUE (2.87 kg lint ha1 mm1 evapotranspiration) and the highest yield.
Abbreviations: ACRI, Australian Cotton Research Institute ALT, CSIRO Advanced Lines Trials ET, evapotranspiration GDD, growing degree days G x E, genotype x environment (interaction) MMD, mean maturity date WUE, water use efficiency
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. N. Stiller, J. J. Read, G. A. Constable, and P. E. Reid Selection for Water Use Efficiency Traits in a Cotton Breeding Program: Cultivar Differences Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1107 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||