Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stiller, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Constable, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stiller, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Constable, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stiller, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Constable, G. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass Management
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Cotton
Published in Agron. J. 96:656-664 (2004).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

PRODUCTION PAPERS

Maturity and Leaf Shape as Traits Influencing Cotton Cultivar Adaptation to Dryland Conditions

Warwick N. Stiller*, Peter E. Reid and Gregory A. Constable

CSIRO Plant Industry, Cotton Research Unit, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia

* Corresponding author (warwick.stiller{at}csiro.au).

Received for publication December 16, 2002. Worldwide, unreliable rainfall is the primary limitation to dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields. Adaptation to these water stress environments has been and still is an important component of many crop improvement programs. This paper summarizes the results of cultivar experiments across three sites and six seasons comparing irrigated and dryland environments in Australia, with the objective of determining the extent of irrigation x cultivar interactions for yield and fiber quality, the effect maturity and leaf type have on those interactions, and the implications this has for a breeding program. On average, dryland cotton yielded 48% of irrigated cotton, and fiber lengths were 4% shorter. There was a significant irrigation x cultivar interaction, with two okra leaf cultivars yielding relatively more under dryland conditions. This interaction varied with site, suggesting that the number of dryland sites utilized in the breeding program could be increased, and consistency of cultivar rankings each season indicated the number of testing seasons could be decreased. It was also concluded that selection under dryland conditions would be beneficial. The data from these experiments indicated a yield penalty for early maturing cultivars under dryland conditions in these environments. There was a strong positive association between maturity and lint yield, with an increase of 34.4 kg lint ha–1 for every day delay in maturity. Agronomic water use efficiency (WUE) varied among cultivars, with a full-season okra leaf cultivar, Siokra L23, having the highest WUE (2.87 kg lint ha–1 mm–1 evapotranspiration) and the highest yield.

Abbreviations: ACRI, Australian Cotton Research Institute • ALT, CSIRO Advanced Lines Trials • ET, evapotranspiration • GDD, growing degree days • G x E, genotype x environment (interaction) • MMD, mean maturity date • WUE, water use efficiency




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. N. Stiller, J. J. Read, G. A. Constable, and P. E. Reid
Selection for Water Use Efficiency Traits in a Cotton Breeding Program: Cultivar Differences
Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1107 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.