HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Suleiman, A. Articles by Crago, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Suleiman, A. Articles by Crago, R. Agricola Articles by Suleiman, A. Articles by Crago, R. Related Collections Agroclimatology Water Stress Evapotranspiration Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions Evapotranspiration Models Surface Hydrology

AGROCLIMATOLOGY

Hourly and Daytime Evapotranspiration from Grassland Using Radiometric Surface Temperatures

^a Cent. for Atmos. Sci., Hampton Univ., Hampton, VA 23668
^b Dep. of Civil and Environ. Eng., Bucknell Univ., Lewisburg, PA 17837

^* Corresponding author (ayman.suleiman{at}hamptonu.edu).

Received for publication July 14, 2002. Determination of evapotranspiration (E) is needed for many applications in agriculture, hydrology, and meteorology. The spatial variability of leaf area index (LAI) and soil water availability makes it impractical to model E over heterogeneous lands using ground-based techniques. Remote sensing can be a good source for both LAI and radiometric surface temperature (T_s) estimates. However, remotely sensed soil moisture content is not suitable for E prediction. In this study, we propose a procedure to estimate E using T_s. The method uses a dimensionless temperature _T, defined as (T_s – T_a)/(T_max – T_a), where T_a is the air temperature and T_max is the surface temperature that would occur if all the net radiation (R_n) was converted to sensible heat flux and no evaporation occurred. This approach has been tested on data from two grassland sites in Oklahoma and Kansas. Root mean square differences between hourly predicted and measured E ranged from 30 to 50 W m^–2. The slope and r² for the zero-intercept linear regression between hourly estimated and measured E ranged from 1.01 to 1.37 and 78 to 0.94, respectively. Daytime conservation of evaporative fraction (EF = E/R_n) was used to extrapolate from hourly to daytime E. The slope and r² of the linear regression between daytime estimated and measured E ranged from 0.89 to 1.07 and 0.69 to 0.9, respectively. These results demonstrate that, for grassland, the model may give good estimates of E when T_a and T_s are available.

Abbreviations: CASES-97, 1997 Cooperative Atmosphere–Surface Exchange Study (experiment) • CWSI, crop water stress index • LAI, leaf area index • SGP-97, 1997 Southern Great Plains (experiment)