HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pettigrew, W. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Pettigrew, W. T. Agricola Articles by Pettigrew, W. T. Related Collections Crop Growth and Development Water Stress Cotton

PRODUCTION PAPER

Moisture Deficit Effects on Cotton Lint Yield, Yield Components, and Boll Distribution

USDA-ARS, Crop Genetics and Prod. Res. Unit, P.O. Box 345, Stoneville, MS 38776

^* Corresponding author (bpettigrew{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication May 6, 2003. Understanding how moisture deficit stress alters cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) reproductive growth and yield component development would provide insight into the current yield stagnation problem plaguing U.S. cotton producers. Objectives were to document the effects of moisture deficit stress on reproductive growth, lint yield, yield components, boll distribution, and fiber quality. Field studies were conducted from 1998 through 2001 utilizing eight diverse genotypes, which were grown under both dryland and irrigated conditions. Weekly white bloom counts, nodes above white bloom, lint yield, yield components, end-of-season plant mapping, and fiber quality data were collected. Genotypes responded similarly to the two soil moisture regimes for all of the parameters evaluated. Irrigation delayed cutout, the slowing of vegetative growth due to strong reproductive demand for assimilate, an average of 6 d. This delayed maturity enabled those plants to sustain flowering later in the growing season compared with dryland plants. During the years when sufficient moisture deficits occurred, the lint yield of dryland plants was reduced 25%, primarily because of a 19% reduction in number of bolls. Irrigated plants produced more bolls at higher plant nodes (>Node 10) and at the more distal positions (2) on the sympodial branches than did the dryland plants. Irrigation did not affect most fiber traits, but 3 out of 4 yr of irrigation produced approximately 2% longer fiber. Production of more bolls higher up the plant and further out the fruiting branch with irrigation indicates that these areas on the plant are where high yields need to be stabilized.

Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting • NAWB, nodes above white bloom

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. I. Mills, C. W. Bednarz, G. L. Ritchie, and J. R. Whitaker Yield, Quality, and Fruit Distribution in Bollgard/Roundup Ready and Bollgard II/Roundup Ready Flex Cottons Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. T. Campbell and P. J. Bauer Genetic Variation for Yield and Fiber Quality Response to Supplemental Irrigation within the Pee Dee Upland Cotton Germplasm Collection Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 591 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Balkcom, D. W. Reeves, J. N. Shaw, C. H. Burmester, and L. M. Curtis Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality from Irrigated Tillage Systems in the Tennessee Valley Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 596 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. T. Pettigrew, W. R. Meredith Jr., and L. D. Young Potassium Fertilization Effects on Cotton Lint Yield, Yield Components, and Reniform Nematode Populations Agron. J., July 13, 2005; 97(4): 1245 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. T. Pettigrew Physiological Consequences of Moisture Deficit Stress in Cotton Crop Sci., July 1, 2004; 44(4): 1265 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]