Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lauriault, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kirksey, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lauriault, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kirksey, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lauriault, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kirksey, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Legumes
Right arrow Intercropping Systems
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Crop Ecology
Right arrow Irrigation
Published in Agron. J. 96:352-358 (2004).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

PRODUCTION PAPER

Yield and Nutritive Value of Irrigated Winter Cereal Forage Grass–Legume Intercrops in the Southern High Plains, USA

L. M. Lauriault* and R. E. Kirksey

Agric. Sci. Center at Tucumcari, New Mexico State Univ., 6502 Quay Road AM.5, Tucumcari, NM 88401

* Corresponding author (lmlaur{at}nmsu.edu).

Received for publication June 26, 2003. With dwindling water supplies, alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and corn (Zea mays L.) producers in the Southern High Plains (USA) seek alternative forages for the dairy industry. At New Mexico State University's Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari, cereal forage monocultures and intercrops with legumes were subjected to two irrigation treatments during two growing seasons in a Canez fine sandy loam (fine-loamy, mixed, thermic Ustollic Haplargid). Dry matter (DM) yield of monocultures averaged 3.76, 3.90, 5.55, 5.59, and 3.17 Mg ha–1 for rye (Secale cereale L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), triticale (x Triticosecale rimpaui Wittm.), and oat (Avena sativa L.), respectively. Cereal forages irrigated once in a growing season yielded equally to those watered twice with average precipitation (2000–2001, 408 mm), but not in a dry growing season (2001–2002, 245 mm) (6.15, 5.41, 1.90, and 3.21 Mg ha–1 for cereal forages irrigated once or twice in 2000–2001 or 2001–2002, respectively). Also, levels of forage nutritive components were greatest when irrigated once in 2001–2002. Intercropping with winter pea [Pisum sativum subsp. arvense (L.) Poir] or hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) reduced yield of wheat and triticale compared with monocultures, but these yields were still greater than those of the other cereal forages and winter pea improved quality indicators when intercropped with wheat or triticale. Water can be conserved in the Southern High Plains by irrigating cereals only as needed for germination or to promote fall growth.

Abbreviations: CP, crude protein • DAP, days after planting • DM, dry matter • LSD, least significant difference • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • NEL, net energy for lactation • NFTA, National Forage Testing Association • NIRS, near infrared reflectance spectroscopy • NS, not significant







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.