HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hansen, D. J. Articles by Wuebker, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hansen, D. J. Articles by Wuebker, M. A. Agricola Articles by Hansen, D. J. Articles by Wuebker, M. A. Related Collections Best Management Practices Nitrogen Nutrients Nutrient Management Animal Waste

FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT

Performance-Based Evaluations of Guidelines for Nitrogen Fertilizer Application after Animal Manure

^a Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. of Delaware Res. and Educ. Cent., 16684 County Seat Hwy., Georgetown, DE 19947
^b Dep. of Agron., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (ablackmr{at}iastate.edu).

Received for publication July 10, 2003. Nitrogen fertilizer needs for corn (Zea mays L.) in fields already treated with animal manure can be estimated by using general guidelines or soil testing for inorganic N. Although the soil-testing approach has been extensively evaluated for ability to predict yield responses to applied N under field conditions, the general-guideline approach has not been subjected to comparable performance-based evaluations. Fertilizer response trials were conducted in 205 manured fields to (i) compare the two approaches for ability to predict corn yield responses to fertilizer N applied after animal manure, (ii) identify reasons for differences in predictive ability, and (iii) explore the benefits of performance-based comparisons of the alternative approaches. Analyses showed that 34% of the observed variability in response could be explained by inorganic N concentrations whereas less than 5% of this variability could be explained by the general-guideline approach. The soil-testing approach, therefore, had greater ability to integrate the effects of all factors affecting yield responses across the range of conditions studied. Mean yield responses (0.55 Mg ha^–1) were smaller than are usually detectable in individual trials, but they were great enough to prompt farmers to fertilize. Results of this study indicate that the most commonly accepted approach to estimating N fertilizer needs is less reliable than generally believed and, therefore, that superior approaches are likely to remain unrecognized unless the performance of the commonly accepted approach is objectively evaluated under realistic field conditions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Mulvaney, S. A. Khan, and T. R. Ellsworth Need for a Soil-Based Approach in Managing Nitrogen Fertilizers for Profitable Corn Production Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., December 2, 2005; 70(1): 172 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]