Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pikul, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, V. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pikul, J. L., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, V. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pikul, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, V. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Water Use
Right arrow Evapotranspiration
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Published in Agron. J. 96:298-304 (2004).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

ALTERNATIVE CROPS

Water Use and Biomass Production of Oat–Pea Hay and Lentil in a Semiarid Climate

J. L. Pikul, Jr.*,a, J. K. Aaseb and V. L. Cochranc

a USDA-ARS, Northern Grain Insects Res. Lab., 2923 Medary Ave., Brookings, SD 57006
b USDA-ARS, Northwest Irrig. and Soils Res. Lab., 3793 N. 3600 E., Kimberly, ID 83341
c USDA-ARS, Northern Plains Agric. Res. Lab., 1500 N. Central Ave., Sidney, MT 59270

* Corresponding author (jpikul{at}ngirl.ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication April 23, 2003. Suitability of alternative crops in the northern Great Plains remains a question because of water limitations. Objectives were to compare water use of an oat (Avena sativa L.)–pea (Pisum sativum L.) mix grown for hay (OPH) to that of black lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus cv. Indianhead) grown as green manure (BL). Water use and plant biomass for OPH and BL were measured near Culbertson, MT (Site 1), during 4 yr. Soil water was measured by neutron attenuation. Precision-weighing lysimeters were used at Site 2, located 65 km southeast of Site 1, to measure water use. Soil was a Williams loam (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Argiustolls). Biomass of crops was measured biweekly. Relative feed value (RFV) based on measured neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber was calculated. Biomass under OPH was 34 and 46% greater than with BL at Sites 1 and 2, respectively. At Site 1, biomass accumulated at a rate of 14 kg ha–1 mm–1 water used under BL and 23 kg ha–1 mm–1 under OPH. Biomass accumulated at a rate of 21 kg ha–1 mm–1 under BL and 29 kg ha–1 mm–1 under OPH at Site 2. Hay RFV, at full bloom in pea, averaged 116 (Number 2 hay), and this did not change appreciably as the crop matured to soft dough stage in oat. Oat–pea hay fits the growing conditions in the northern Great Plains and meets the needs of producers for high quality hay.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • BL, black lentil grown as a green manure • CV, coefficient of variation • ET, evapotranspiration • GDD, growing degree days • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • OPH, oat–pea mix grown for hay • RFV, relative feed value • SW–BLc, spring wheat–black lentil rotation where black lentil was terminated by chemical • SW–BLd, spring wheat–black lentil rotation where black lentil was terminated by disking • SW–CF, 2-yr rotation of spring wheat–chemical fallow (no tillage during fallow) • SW–OPH, 4-yr rotation of spring wheat–buckwheat–fallow–oat/pea mix grown for hay • WW–OPH, 4-yr rotation of winter wheat–buckwheat–fallow–oat/pea mix grown for hay







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.